Abstract:FXDD, a prominent forex broker, has recently sparked widespread concern among its users due to reported difficulties in withdrawals. Many customers have voiced complaints alleging their inability to withdraw funds from the platform. This issue has escalated further with the recent circulation of an email to users, purportedly from FXDD, announcing a change in leadership.

FXDD, a prominent forex broker, has recently sparked widespread concern among its users due to reported difficulties in withdrawals. Many customers have voiced complaints alleging their inability to withdraw funds from the platform. This issue has escalated further with the recent circulation of an email to users, purportedly from FXDD, announcing a change in leadership.
According to the email, FXDD's founder, Emil Assentato, has transferred ownership of FXDD Trading SAC to a new entity, 888 Markets Group (Co. 13397886). This group, described as a consortium of UK-based companies, aims to uphold and continue FXDD's legacy of success. However, scrutiny reveals that 888 Markets Group holds a low rating of 1.49/10 on WikiFX, a platform that rates forex brokers based on user experiences and regulatory status. Importantly, WikiFX notes that 888 Markets Group operates without regulatory licenses, labeling it as a high-risk platform.

Critics and concerned users have questioned the authenticity of FXDD's email, suggesting it may serve as a convenient excuse to delay or deny user withdrawal requests. WikiFX has issued a cautionary statement advising users to remain vigilant and exercise caution when dealing with 888 Markets Group.
The controversy surrounding FXDD highlights the challenges faced by investors in the forex industry, emphasizing the importance of thorough due diligence and regulatory compliance when choosing a brokerage. As developments unfold, stakeholders await further clarification from FXDD regarding the implications of this ownership transfer and its impact on user funds and operations.
Warning! 888 Markets official website is not available. This is a red flag for traders.

About FXDD

FXDD Trading offers a range of market instruments, including forex pairs, metals, energies, indices, cryptocurrencies, and stocks, providing traders with diverse trading opportunities. The platform offers two account types: Standard Account, which provides low spreads with no commissions, and ECN Account, which offers ultra-low spreads but involves small commission costs.
However, one significant drawback of FXDD Trading is the lack of regulatory assurance, which may raise concerns for potential traders. WikiFX has given this broker a low score of 2.09/10.


Errante, a Seychelles-based brokerage entity, is facing serious trading allegations from users globally. Users claim to have earned profits legitimately using their strategies. However, on the Errante login dashboard, many users reported an automatic deduction of earned profits. At the same time, withdrawal issues allegedly haunt many traders here. While investigating, we also found complaints concerning trade order manipulations by the broker. In this Errante review, we have examined these allegations and given an overview of its regulatory status.

A forex liquidity provider decision now shapes the broker's spreads, fills, slippage, hedging cost, regulatory exposure, and exit options long after the platform is chosen. This 2026 guide explains what a forex LP actually delivers versus what the marketing claim says, how tier-1 banks, prime of prime, and multi-LP aggregators differ in practice, and how execution models (DMA, ECN, STP) change the broker's daily operating reality. It also walks through due diligence on credit, technology, reporting, governance, and exit, and shows how a 2026 broker can combine a primary LP with secondary routing without losing control of the client experience. Use the decision matrix, integration timeline, and operational tests to compare an fx liquidity provider before contract signature, not after a market event.

Did LMAX Group deny you withdrawals citing frozen funds at the wallet service provider’s end? Have you been so exhausted by the endless withdrawal hassles that you have begun to stop investing in the platform? Has this UK-based liquidity provider even questioned your fund ownership status when you requested withdrawals? You are not alone! Many users have complained about these issues while sharing their LMAX Group reviews.

A TickTrader white label can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the TickTrader platform is, where a Soft-FX broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server licence, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks TickTrader cost beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a Soft-FX TickTrader provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.