Abstract:EC Markets has reported a record $5.13 trillion trading volume in Q1 2026, marking a 14.6% increase from the previous quarter. The broker also saw an 18.3% rise in active traders, with the majority of its trading volume now coming from non-forex assets.

EC Markets, a leading global retail broker, has reported a significant increase in trading activity for Q1 2026, with a total trading volume of $5.13 trillion. This represents a 14.6% increase compared to the previous quarter. The growth in volume, combined with a substantial rise in active client participation, has positioned the broker among the top three by trading volume globally.
The number of active traders increased by 18.3% in the first quarter of 2026, reaching 272,000 clients. On average, EC Markets saw monthly trading volumes of $1.7 trillion, with daily volumes reaching $81.4 billion. The company attributes this growth to heightened demand for multi-asset trading, which continues to dominate client preferences.
Shift Toward Multi-Asset Trading
While forex trading has traditionally been a core focus for brokers like EC Markets, the companys latest figures indicate a shift in client behavior. In Q1 2026, forex trading accounted for just 2% of the overall trading volume, with 98% of activity driven by other asset classes such as commodities, indices, and digital assets. This reflects the growing trend among traders towards more diversified portfolios, seeking exposure to a wider range of financial instruments.
This trend is also mirrored in the companys geographic expansion, with EC Markets increasing its footprint in regions like Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. The broker continues to invest in technology and regulatory compliance to meet the evolving needs of its client base.
Brand Growth Through Strategic Partnerships
In addition to its impressive trading volumes, EC Markets has been focusing on brand recognition through strategic partnerships, such as its association with Liverpool FC. These partnerships help increase visibility and attract new clients, further cementing the firms position as a competitive player in the global market.
The continued growth and diversification of its product offerings have allowed EC Markets to remain resilient in an increasingly competitive market.
Looking Ahead: Adapting to a Changing Financial Landscape
Despite strong performance in Q1 2026, the market remains dynamic, and the broker is aware of the challenges ahead. EC Markets plans to continue adapting to market changes by focusing on technological innovation, regulatory compliance, and enhancing client services to ensure ongoing growth and competitiveness.
The firm is also actively expanding its multi-asset offerings, aligning its strategies with the growing demand for diversified investment options among retail traders.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a trusted source for detailed reviews and information about forex brokers worldwide. With a mission to help traders make informed decisions, WikiFX provides insights into broker licensing, regulatory compliance, and client feedback, ensuring transparency in the forex trading landscape.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.
The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.