Abstract:B2Prime review 2026: revenue reached €52.8 million in 2025, but traders still need to look at B2Prime regulation, B2Prime rating, licences, products, and field survey results before deciding.

B2Prime is back in the spotlight after reporting €52.8 million in client trading income and €15.0 million in net profitfor 2025. The company also said equity and retained earnings rose to €15.4 million, while long-term borrowings were reduced to zero. Those numbers give the brand a fresh visibility boost, but a review of B2Prime is still about more than one strong financial year. Regulation, operating structure, product coverage, and what appears on WikiFX remain the more practical questions.

More broker information:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/8961920515.html
Current WikiFX data shows B2Prime / B2BROKER with an overall score of 6.24/10. On the same profile, the regulation component is shown at 7.16, the licence component at 6.94, the software score at 7.32, and the business score at 7.51. That is not a low-end profile, but it is also not presented as a top-tier near-perfect broker page.

From a review perspective, that middle-ground rating matters. It suggests the brand has a visible regulatory and operational structure, but still sits in the category where traders and institutions are likely to keep checking the details rather than relying on the headline alone.
One of the stronger parts of the WikiFX profile is the licence footprint. The page shows five forex-related licences, including regulated entities in Malaysia, Cyprus, South Africa, and the UAE, plus an offshore-regulated entity in Seychelles.

For anyone searching terms like B2Prime licence or B2Prime regulation, this is where the review becomes more concrete. The broker is not presented as a thin one-entity offshore operation. The profile instead points to a multi-entity structure spread across several jurisdictions. That does not automatically answer every risk question, but it does separate B2Prime from the kinds of broker profiles that show little more than a domain name and a loose registration story.
The two names are closely connected and are often searched interchangeably. Public company materials describe B2PRIME as the groups prime-of-prime liquidity provider, while B2BROKER is used for the wider technology and liquidity business. The B2PRIME website presents the brand as a globally regulated multi-asset prime-of-prime liquidity provider, and the Cyprus entity behind the operation is identified in broker materials as B2B Prime Services EU Limited.
In plain terms, B2Prime is not an unrelated label sitting next to B2BROKER by coincidence. It operates as part of the same broader group structure, with B2Prime representing the regulated liquidity and execution side that is most relevant to this review.
The recent 2025 results are not the whole review, but they are relevant because they point to how the business is scaling. The companys latest figures showed client trading income up 165% year-on-year, net profit at €15.0 million, and equity plus retained earnings up 81%. The same release said long-term borrowings had been fully repaid, leaving a 0% debt-to-equity ratio.
That kind of update does not prove execution quality, pricing, or suitability for every client. What it does show is that B2Prime is not entering 2026 as a dormant or shrinking name. It is arriving with stronger balance-sheet optics and higher trading activity than before, which naturally feeds into how the market looks at the broker.
WikiFX describes B2Prime as a multi-asset liquidity provider offering Crypto CFDs, forex, NDFs as CFDs, equity indices, precious metals, and commodities, together with related liquidity solutions. That lines up with the broader product identity shown across the brands public materials.

This is not the profile of a narrow single-asset broker. The product mix is clearly built around liquidity and multi-asset execution rather than a simple retail-only FX setup. That product breadth is one reason B2Prime tends to attract attention from traders who are looking not just for a standard broker account, but for a more infrastructure-oriented market access provider.
WikiFX field survey records add something useful here because they move beyond licence displays and website claims.
A WikiFX field survey in Cyprus reported that B2PRIME was found at its regulatory address, with company signage and a visible office presence at the inspected location.

Cyprus field survey:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/survey/807600f97a.html
A separate WikiFX survey in Belarus, however, reached a different conclusion. That report stated that inspectors did not find B2PRIME-related signage or confirmed office occupancy at the inspected address, and the report concluded that the broker did not appear to operate from that location.

Belarus field survey:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/survey/5594502bd5.html
This does not create a neat all-positive or all-negative narrative. What it does show is that physical presence checks can vary by entity and jurisdiction, which makes it more useful to read B2Prime as a group with multiple operating layers rather than as a single-location story.
The operating timeline also appears broadly consistent with the broker‘s public profile. WikiFX lists the brand as operating for 5–10 years, while domain data and company-facing materials place b2prime.com back in 2017, which fits the group’s stated timeline. Public-facing company information also continues to place B2BROKER and B2PRIME within the same broader ecosystem.
That may sound like a small point, but in broker reviews it matters. A timeline that broadly matches the brand story is a different signal from the kinds of cases where domain age, legal entity dates, and product branding all point in different directions.
A fair B2Prime review does not end with a simple yes-or-no answer.
On the positive side, the broker shows a real regulatory footprint, a mid-to-upper WikiFX score, a broad product offering, a visible Cyprus office in field survey results, and a financial update that points to strong 2025 growth.
On the more cautious side, the overall rating is not exceptionally high, the field survey picture is mixed across jurisdictions, and the brand structure is complex enough that users still need to confirm which entity they are actually dealing with.
That leaves B2Prime in a category that looks stronger than many low-quality broker profiles, but still benefits from proper due diligence. For traders searching B2Prime review, B2Prime rating, or B2Prime licence, the main takeaway is straightforward: the broker has enough structure and visibility to be taken seriously, but not enough simplicity for background checks to be skipped.


Have you experienced issues with Pepperstone deposit & withdrawal processing? From your experience, do you feel that the Australia-based forex broker causes losses to its clients? Did the brokerage entity freeze your account and give you a margin call? All these trading allegations have been rampant on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This Pepperstone review article takes a close look at the user complaints, especially in 2026. Additionally, we have given an overview of the regulatory framework under which the brokerage entity operates.

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.

If you have spent even a week inside trading communities lately, you already know the pitch by heart. Pass a quick "challenge," get handed a funded account worth tens of thousands of dollars, and keep up to 80% of everything you make. No risking your own savings, no slow grind of building capital from scratch — just skill, a small fee, and a fast track to the big leagues. It is the exact dream every new trader is secretly chasing, and an entire industry has sprung up to sell it. XPO Fund is one of the louder voices selling that story right now. Its website is slick, its plans sound generous, and its marketing leans hard on words like "industry's lowest fee" and "fast payouts." But before you reach for your card, there is one number sitting quietly on this firm's profile — a number it would rather you scroll past — that every experienced trader would beg you to look at first. And no, it is not the profit split. Let's pull XPO Fund apart piece by piece: what it actually is, who is real