Abstract:Trive, a Netherlands-based leading CFD broker across forex, stocks, indices and commodities, is facing ire from its employees on the unpaid salary crisis that has haunted them for four months starting from November 2025. Upset over such a long delay, employees have been using social media platforms to express their frustration. Read on for more revelation.

Trive, a Netherlands-based leading CFD broker across forex, stocks, indices and commodities, is facing ire from its employees on the unpaid salary crisis that has haunted them for four months starting from November 2025. Upset over such a long delay, employees have been using social media platforms to express their frustration.
As soon as the employee posts criticizing the company over the failure to pay their salaries made rounds, the companys HR department got into action. It reportedly requested these employees to take posts down within 48 hours of them going viral. Employees express irony over the corporate ethics at Trive, which allegedly considers it wrong to speak about the lack of payment, according to a post. However, the employee expressed concerns over the withheld earned wages leading to the repossession of the car and the potential eviction being considered normal by the company. An employee, in a sarcastic tone, hit out at the HR management, saying that such crisis management would help them get a raise.
According to the rumors, the company‘s Head Office has acknowledged the settlement request raised by the employees. According to them, they requested the wages they legally earned and were promised in writing in January. They do not ask for a bonus or payout, the employee statement added. However, the post says it as a familiar script from the company, saying that the payment is in process, waiting for final confirmation. This, according to the post, has been on for weeks and months. The post dismissed the pending salaries as having anything to do with the liquidity issue. Rather, it’s a choice, the post added.
Meanwhile, while investigating the case, we also stumbled upon a note from the company‘s HR manager asking employees to return equipment to Trive International Consultancy Sdn BHD’s office in Malaysia within 10 days of the letter issuance date. While the delivery charges incurred on equipment would be borne by the company, failure to provide this to it would result in the absorption of the balance amount payable in lieu of the unreturned equipment. The issued letter requested the submission of a final invoice with the payment amount and delivery charges. According to the letter, the final amount would be put on hold until the company obtains the equipment. Within 15 days of the receipt of the equipment, the company will issue the payment to the employee.

An employee expressed that if the brokerage house cannot or will not settle its staff salary, how can it make its clients & traders‘ capital secure on its platform? If the company takes five months to confirm employees’ payment settlement, how long will it take to process clients withdrawals?
The doubts expressed by employees' posts over the inability to pay traders seem to be taking effect. On WikiFX, a leading forex regulation inquiry app, there have been many withdrawal complaints against Trive since the last four-five months. The broker officials reported having told traders about withdrawals in two-three business days. However, exposure reports reveal a massive delay, even lasting beyond a month. Here are some withdrawal denial complaints that have surfaced recently.






Trive Investment B.V. offers investment services through several wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide, including the United States, Europe, Africa, Australia, Indonesia, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. These companies are licensed by reputable regulators globally. These include the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in Australia, the Financial Industry Regulation Authority (FINRA) in the US, the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (BAPPEBTI) in Indonesia, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) in Mauritius and the British Virgin Islands, and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa.
For more updates on forex brokers, including their regulatary status, download the new WikiFX app crafted for a more seamless experience. Scan the QR code below to start experiencing it.


If you have spent even a week inside trading communities lately, you already know the pitch by heart. Pass a quick "challenge," get handed a funded account worth tens of thousands of dollars, and keep up to 80% of everything you make. No risking your own savings, no slow grind of building capital from scratch — just skill, a small fee, and a fast track to the big leagues. It is the exact dream every new trader is secretly chasing, and an entire industry has sprung up to sell it. XPO Fund is one of the louder voices selling that story right now. Its website is slick, its plans sound generous, and its marketing leans hard on words like "industry's lowest fee" and "fast payouts." But before you reach for your card, there is one number sitting quietly on this firm's profile — a number it would rather you scroll past — that every experienced trader would beg you to look at first. And no, it is not the profit split. Let's pull XPO Fund apart piece by piece: what it actually is, who is real

Every broker with a marketing budget now slaps the letters "ECN" on its homepage. Few of them actually deliver what those letters promise. For a serious trader — a scalper, a day trader, an algo trader, anyone whose edge lives or dies on execution quality — the gap between a true ECN broker and a market maker wearing an ECN costume can quietly cost you hundreds of pips a year in slippage, requotes, and inflated spreads. So we cut through the marketing, looked at the brokers that genuinely offer raw pricing and deep liquidity, and cross-checked every one of them on WikiFX. Here are the six ECN accounts that actually earn the label in 2026 — ranked. First, a short primer, because understanding ECN is what lets you judge these brokers properly.

If you have been shopping around for a forex broker and landed on FX Novus and VCG Markets, you have stumbled onto a genuinely instructive pair. On the surface they look like cousins: both are relatively young, both wave around multi-asset trading and tight spreads, and both operate from the kind of offshore corners of the world that should make any beginner slow down. But dig into the data on WikiFX and the two part ways sharply. One carries active, screaming red flags. The other is merely standing in a yellow zone. Neither is what a cautious newcomer would call "safe" — but understanding how they differ is exactly the kind of lesson that protects your money. Let's put them head to head, decode the jargon along the way, and reach an honest verdict.

There are few feelings in trading more sickening than this one: you funded your account, you walked away confident your money was safe, and when you came back to check on it, the platform calmly informed you that your login details were wrong. Not your trades — your very identity, locked out. And on the other side of that login screen sits a balance you can no longer touch and a support team that has gone silent. That is the heart of a complaint filed against New Frontier on WikiFX. One trader reported depositing 40,500 pesos, returning to log in with the exact email and password they had registered, and being told the data was "incorrect" — which, in their words, meant their earnings had simply been taken. Customer service, they said, did not react. Let's look closely at this broker, what makes its profile so unsettling, and why verification here is not optional.