Abstract:Gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States represents the total aggregate output of the U.S. economy. It is important to keep in mind that the GDP figures, as reported to investors, are already adjusted for inflation.

Gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States represents the total aggregate output of the U.S. economy. It is important to keep in mind that the GDP figures, as reported to investors, are already adjusted for inflation. The risk appetite in global markets came under pressure while safe-haven demand increased after the US GDP and inflation data on Friday. For the first quarter, the US GDP posted a big “bearish” surprise, rising by only 1.1% compared to the forecast of 1.9%. Looking at the GDP separately for the four main components (consumption, investment, government purchases, and net exports), it is evident that it was the investment component that dragged down the headline reading while consumption and government purchases maintained a good positive momentum:

In annual terms, consumption grew by 3.7%, with a strong jump in January when unusually warm weather stimulated early activity rebound after December. Government purchases increased by 4.7% in annual terms, and net exports added 0.11% to the annual GDP growth rate.
However, the deficiency of the main indicator was hidden in downside momentum of investments (21% of GDP). It consists of three main components: investments in fixed assets, firm inventories, and households' residential investments. While firm investments in fixed assets grew by 0.7% (quite weakly), investments in housing decreased by 4.2%. In quarterly terms, this indicator has been decreasing for 8 consecutive quarters due to pressure from mortgage rates combined with sticky high housing prices that accelerated during the period of low rates after the pandemic. Firms also reduced their inventories in the first quarter (which is considered negative investment), which took away 2.26 percentage points from the GDP growth rate.
As for inflation, the core GDP deflator (one of the inflation metrics) increased by 4.9% on an annual basis, up from 4.4% in the previous quarter and above the consensus of 4.7%. Along with disappointment over the GDP data, the market was forced to reprice the risks of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy tightening in light of hawkish inflation data for May 1. The rise in Core PCE exceeded expectations - 4.6% versus the forecasted 4.5%. The February figure was revised upward to 4.7%. Monthly inflation was in line with expectations at 0.3%.
In the next quarter, consumption is likely to make a less significant contribution to GDP, given recent consumer trends (decline in retail sales). Weak investments suggest a reduction in corporate optimism about the short-term prospects of the US economy. CEO surveys of US companies and the NFIB small business index indicate preparations for a downturn and recession, which will further depress hiring and investment in capital goods.
The consensus for Q2 GDP growth is shifting closer to 0, and the actions of the Fed, which is forced to fight inflation, will likely bring the onset of a recession in the US economy closer. Also, we cannot underestimate the possibility of new banking shocks, which could lead to a sharp tightening of credit conditions and further hit economic activity.
The dollar received a boost on May 1 due to increased demand for the US currency as a safe haven asset. Looking at the EURUSD pair, it can be seen that the price is consolidating around the lower boundary of the uptrend channel, which can be seen as a signal that the uptrend may be petering out and closer to the Fed meeting, there may be a break downward:



Failed to withdraw your funds successfully from the TDFX platform? Did the Australia-based brokerage firm illegitimately take away your trading profits? Have you witnessed losses on the broker’s trading platform due to heavy slippage? Did you also struggle transferring your funds from the TDFX trading account? You are not alone! These allegations have somewhat degraded the rating of the forex broker. Through this TDFX review article, we aim to investigate user complaints so that you can decide whether this trading enterprise is right for you. Keep reading to find our analysis.

With the rapid growth of the global multi-asset investment market, the disparities in the forex industry across different regions have become increasingly evident. As a forex broker information service platform operating in over 200 countries and regions, WikiFX is committed to helping investors in each region identify reliable brokers. Therefore, WikiFX launched a series content — Close Up with WikiFX, which offers in-depth interviews with local brokers. Leveraging WikiFXs robust big data system and industry insights, the series aims to help investors gain a deeper understanding of high-quality brokers. In this exclusive interview, we had the opportunity to speak with Konstantinos Theodorou, CEO of InterStellar Group-Cyprus, to explore the company’s operations and market insights.

BotBro is a Dubai-based forex broker that has continued to grab headlines for years, with its name being involved in one scam after another. In the latest episode, its name was found in the alleged INR 800 crore forex and crypto trading scam in Goa. Top-level agencies, including the Enforcement Directorate (ED), are investigating the case. They have labeled the platform as a Ponzi scheme. The platform is disguised as an AI-powered forex trading app. In connection with this case, the Goa Police Economic Offences Cell (EOC) filed a First Information Report (FIR) against 10 individuals, including the company owner, Lavish Chaudhary Alias Nawab Ali, for fund misappropriation worth over INR 7.3 crore. Read on as we share the BotBro review in this article.

In what would lift the mood of rupee derivative traders, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) partially lifted some restrictions on rupee derivative trades imposed by the regulator on April 1, 2026. On this day, the central bank prevented banks from issuing non-deliverable forwards to clients and barred companies from reassessing forward contracts as part of its strategy to counter arbitrage trades, which caused fluctuations in the rupee’s exchange rate. The central bank further prevented banks from signing FX derivative contracts involving the rupee with their associated parties. Read on!