Abstract:In order to gather information for a case against $75 million Ponzi scam Oasis International, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has obtained authorization from the Court to subpoena UK-based Forex company ATC Brokers.
The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has secured a permission from the Court to issue subpoenas to UK-based Forex firm ATC Brokers as the regulator seeks to gather information related to a lawsuit targeting $75 million Ponzi scheme Oasis International.
Earlier this week, Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn of the Florida Middle District Court issued an order granting the CFTCs request for the subpoenas.
Let‘s recall that, on April 15, 2019, the CFTC filed an emergency ex parte action to halt a $75 million Ponzi scheme that allegedly violated anti-fraud and registration provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (2018), and the Commission’s Regulations. That same day, the Court entered a statutory restraining order, which among other things, prohibited the withdrawal, transfer, removal, dissipation, and disposal of assets by the defendants, and appointed a receiver, Burton W. Wiand.
The Oasis Ponzi scheme involved solicitation and misappropriation of money from over 700 U.S. residents for pooled investments in retail FX contracts. As alleged, pool funds were transferred to a forex trading account in the United Kingdom.
On March 31, 2021, the Receiver filed a motion to approve his engagement of contingency counsel for the purpose of further investigating and pursuing claims against ATC Brokers, Ltd. (“ATC UK”) and related individuals and entities.
ATC UK is a United Kingdom “brokerage firm that serves the forex industry from its headquarters in London and operations in the U.S.” In his ATC Motion, the Receiver alleges, among other things, facts that indicate ATC UK may have been complicit in the fraud perpetrated by Oasis and its principals. On April 20, the Court granted the Receivers ATC Motion.
ATC UK is affiliated with ATC Brokers (“ATC US”), based in Glendale, California. ATC US is registered as an introducing broker with the CFTC and listed as a forex firm and member with the National Futures Association (NFA), a self-regulatory organization designated by the CFTC as a registered futures association.
David Manoukian is the Chief Executive Officer of ATC US and is registered as an associated person of ATC US with the CFTC and listed as a principal and forex associated person of ATC US with NFA. As CFTC registrants, the CFTC has regulatory responsibilities associated with ATC US and Manoukian—neither of whom are currently defendants in this action.
The CFTC sought to conduct third-party discovery related to the issues raised by the Receivers ATC Motion.
The CFTC asked the Court for an order granting limited relief from the stay of this litigation such that the CFTC may issue Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoenas to the ATC Entities, as well as to any other non-party entities and individuals the CFTC believes likely to possess relevant information related to claims and possible defenses involving the ATC Entities.
The Court has agreed with the CFTC and the regulator may now proceed with issuing the subpoenas.

Spreads. The single forex cost that quietly eats into every trade you place, every single day, regardless of whether you win or lose. For active traders in India and Pakistan — where most retail traders run on tight margins and bigger position sizes — the difference between a 0.6-pip spread and a 1.6-pip spread can be the difference between a profitable month and a losing one. But here is what most "best spreads" articles will not tell you: a broker advertising 0.0-pip spreads is almost meaningless if they slip your orders by 5 pips during news, freeze your withdrawals, or appear on the RBI Alert List. Real-world spread cost is only one part of the equation. Real-world total cost — including commission, slippage, execution quality, and regulatory protection — is what actually determines whether you keep your profits. This is WikiFX's 2026 ranking of the lowest-spread brokers serving South Asian retail traders, factoring in not just headline numbers but operational reality.

naqdi, a South Africa-based forex broker, is reportedly facing criticism from users over the long-pending withdrawal cases. Some users reported four to eight months of unresolved fund withdrawal requests. With no support over these requests, their frustration became evident in the naqdi reviews they shared online. This article sheds light on those complaints while giving users a view of the broker’s regulatory status

Did you lose all your investments on the Maxpro365 platform? Did you fail to witness your deposits on the trading platform? Have you found the procedures regarding fund withdrawals tedious compared to that of deposits? Failed to receive adequate assistance from the customer support team? You are not alone! Many traders, especially from India, have expressed their concerns while sharing the Maxpro365 review online. This article provides an insight into the complaints as well as a regulatory overview of the broker for more informed decision-making.

Clarify Capital stands out as a recommended forex broker with an impressive 7.9 out of 10 overall rating, backed by overwhelmingly positive feedback from its trading community. With 200 total reviews and a remarkably low negative rate of just 0.5%, the broker has established itself as a reliable choice for traders seeking a trustworthy platform. The sentiment distribution speaks volumes, with 194 positive reviews compared to only 1 negative and 5 neutral responses, demonstrating consistent satisfaction across its user base. Traders particularly praise Clarify Capital for three standout qualities: responsive customer support that addresses concerns promptly, a solid reputation for safety that instills confidence in clients, and straightforward deposit and withdrawal processes that make fund management hassle-free.