Abstract:In order to gather information for a case against $75 million Ponzi scam Oasis International, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has obtained authorization from the Court to subpoena UK-based Forex company ATC Brokers.
The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has secured a permission from the Court to issue subpoenas to UK-based Forex firm ATC Brokers as the regulator seeks to gather information related to a lawsuit targeting $75 million Ponzi scheme Oasis International.
Earlier this week, Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn of the Florida Middle District Court issued an order granting the CFTCs request for the subpoenas.
Let‘s recall that, on April 15, 2019, the CFTC filed an emergency ex parte action to halt a $75 million Ponzi scheme that allegedly violated anti-fraud and registration provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (2018), and the Commission’s Regulations. That same day, the Court entered a statutory restraining order, which among other things, prohibited the withdrawal, transfer, removal, dissipation, and disposal of assets by the defendants, and appointed a receiver, Burton W. Wiand.
The Oasis Ponzi scheme involved solicitation and misappropriation of money from over 700 U.S. residents for pooled investments in retail FX contracts. As alleged, pool funds were transferred to a forex trading account in the United Kingdom.
On March 31, 2021, the Receiver filed a motion to approve his engagement of contingency counsel for the purpose of further investigating and pursuing claims against ATC Brokers, Ltd. (“ATC UK”) and related individuals and entities.
ATC UK is a United Kingdom “brokerage firm that serves the forex industry from its headquarters in London and operations in the U.S.” In his ATC Motion, the Receiver alleges, among other things, facts that indicate ATC UK may have been complicit in the fraud perpetrated by Oasis and its principals. On April 20, the Court granted the Receivers ATC Motion.
ATC UK is affiliated with ATC Brokers (“ATC US”), based in Glendale, California. ATC US is registered as an introducing broker with the CFTC and listed as a forex firm and member with the National Futures Association (NFA), a self-regulatory organization designated by the CFTC as a registered futures association.
David Manoukian is the Chief Executive Officer of ATC US and is registered as an associated person of ATC US with the CFTC and listed as a principal and forex associated person of ATC US with NFA. As CFTC registrants, the CFTC has regulatory responsibilities associated with ATC US and Manoukian—neither of whom are currently defendants in this action.
The CFTC sought to conduct third-party discovery related to the issues raised by the Receivers ATC Motion.
The CFTC asked the Court for an order granting limited relief from the stay of this litigation such that the CFTC may issue Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoenas to the ATC Entities, as well as to any other non-party entities and individuals the CFTC believes likely to possess relevant information related to claims and possible defenses involving the ATC Entities.
The Court has agreed with the CFTC and the regulator may now proceed with issuing the subpoenas.

Did your funds fail to reach your account despite being approved by EASY TRADING ONLINE, an Australia-based brokerage entity? Have you been subject to months of withdrawal delays despite being compliant with norms? Did your trading account suddenly become invalid upon a withdrawal request? All of these complaints have come up on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This EASY TRADING ONLINE review studies multiple user complaints while also updating its existing regulatory status.

SEBI changed India’s commodity derivatives position-limit framework on 9 September 2026, and the circular took effect immediately. The new SEBI commodity position limits double the client-level caps for agricultural commodities to 2% of deliverable supply for Broad commodities, 1% for Narrow commodities and 0.5% for sensitive commodities. SEBI also capped the daily monetary penalty for a client-level breach: ₹200,000 where the violation exceeds 2% of the prescribed limit, and ₹10,000 where it is up to 2%. Traders should not read the change as permission to ignore exchange risk controls; excess positions can still be squared off.

RYOEX’s Saint Lucia licence-information link opens a legal opinion dated 20 May 2025. The document identifies 2023-00370 as a company number and describes the local legal framework; it is not a trading licence issued by a regulator. This RYOEX review separates that document from the website’s marketing language, checks the different statuses of two account complaints, and explains the separate authorisation question facing Indian residents.

SIMPLEFX, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based brokerage entity, receives complaints mostly about trading chart manipulations. Generally, while researching broker reviews, complaints usually centre on hassles concerning fund withdrawals. User complaints for this broker have come from many regions, including South Asia. This SIMPLEFX review examines these user allegations and shares its regulatory framework.