Abstract:Japan’s Kanto Local Finance Bureau issued an unregistered-business warning concerning Proxtrend Ltd on 20 June 2025. The notice concerns online solicitation of over-the-counter derivatives. This Proxtrend LTD review, checked on 11 September 2026, examines that dated warning alongside the broker’s corporate disclosures and the separate rules relevant to residents of India. The warning is not a new September announcement or an Indian regulatory finding.

Japan‘s Kanto Local Finance Bureau issued an unregistered-business warning concerning Proxtrend Ltd on 20 June 2025. The notice concerns online solicitation of over-the-counter derivatives. This Proxtrend LTD review, checked on 11 September 2026, examines that dated warning alongside the broker’s corporate disclosures and the separate rules relevant to residents of India. The warning is not a new September announcement or an Indian regulatory finding.
The reviewed material does not establish authorisation for the proposed forex service in India. A foreign licence claim and a Japanese registration warning address different jurisdictions; neither substitutes for checking the Indian entity, platform and transaction requirements. The available evidence also does not justify presenting a blanket finding of fraud.
The practical decision is whether the specific service, contracting company and funding route can be verified before money is sent. A familiar brand name or a functioning website is not enough to answer those questions.
The bureau names Proxtrend Ltd, identifies the service as Proxtrend, and gives P.B. 1257 Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Comoros, KM as the stated address. It describes solicitation through the internet and identifies the business as unregistered. Those are the notice’s specific findings; they should not be rewritten as an Indian ban, a criminal conviction or a finding about every customers withdrawal.
The same notice says the address is identical or similar to those of other warned businesses, including Zenith Markets PLC and DAM Group Ltd. Crucially, it says their relationship with Proxtrend is unknown. An address match therefore warrants further identity checks, but does not establish common owners or a coordinated fraud network.
The footer of proxtrendltd.com/legal says Proxtrend Ltd operates that website and owns the Proxtrend brand. It claims registration in Mwali (Moheli) and authorisation by the Mwali International Services Authority under licence BFX2024053, with the same Bonovo Road address. This article records the company‘s statement; it does not independently confirm the licence’s current status or scope.
The name and address align with the Japanese notice, but that does not authenticate every similarly branded domain or payment instruction. Ask for the actual contracting entity, the relevant official register entry and permission for the offered activity. The brokers footer also warns that leveraged CFDs can result in losing the entire account balance; A licence claim does not remove trading risk.
RBIs forex FAQ states that residents may undertake forex transactions only with authorised persons and for permitted purposes. Permitted electronic transactions should use RBI-authorised electronic trading platforms or recognised stock exchanges, as applicable. The FAQ also states that overseas margin and margin-call remittances are not allowed under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme.
RBI further explains that its Alert List is not exhaustive, so absence from it does not establish authorisation. These are general rules, not evidence that RBI has issued a Proxtrend-specific warning. An overseas address or licence statement does not establish an Indian residents eligibility to use the service.
The dated Japanese warning and the brokers own entity disclosures raise concrete verification questions. The shared address must remain a qualified observation, not an ownership allegation. For a resident of India, the next step is documentary and regulatory verification—not a small deposit to test whether the platform appears to work.
This article reviews public information and is not personalised financial or legal advice.
Knowledge pays at WikiFX.Every time you share a WikiFX article, you'll receive 50 Reward Points. Grow your rewards with every share and unlock exclusive gifts in the WikiFX Points Mall. Start earning today!


Did your funds fail to reach your account despite being approved by EASY TRADING ONLINE, an Australia-based brokerage entity? Have you been subject to months of withdrawal delays despite being compliant with norms? Did your trading account suddenly become invalid upon a withdrawal request? All of these complaints have come up on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This EASY TRADING ONLINE review studies multiple user complaints while also updating its existing regulatory status.

SEBI changed India’s commodity derivatives position-limit framework on 9 September 2026, and the circular took effect immediately. The new SEBI commodity position limits double the client-level caps for agricultural commodities to 2% of deliverable supply for Broad commodities, 1% for Narrow commodities and 0.5% for sensitive commodities. SEBI also capped the daily monetary penalty for a client-level breach: ₹200,000 where the violation exceeds 2% of the prescribed limit, and ₹10,000 where it is up to 2%. Traders should not read the change as permission to ignore exchange risk controls; excess positions can still be squared off.

RYOEX’s Saint Lucia licence-information link opens a legal opinion dated 20 May 2025. The document identifies 2023-00370 as a company number and describes the local legal framework; it is not a trading licence issued by a regulator. This RYOEX review separates that document from the website’s marketing language, checks the different statuses of two account complaints, and explains the separate authorisation question facing Indian residents.

SIMPLEFX, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based brokerage entity, receives complaints mostly about trading chart manipulations. Generally, while researching broker reviews, complaints usually centre on hassles concerning fund withdrawals. User complaints for this broker have come from many regions, including South Asia. This SIMPLEFX review examines these user allegations and shares its regulatory framework.