AssetsFX Regulation Revealed : Is AssetsFX Safe ?

When choosing a forex broker, the most important question is whether it's regulated and safe. For traders looking at AssetsFX, finding clear answers about AssetsFX Regulation and AssetsFX License status shows a complicated and worrying picture. According to WikiFX, a global broker research platform, AssetsFX gets a “Warning: Low score, please stay away!” rating and is listed as having “No Regulation.” This warning sign suggests serious risks for investors. This article will examine AssetsFX's company structure, look at its conflicting claims about regulation, and analyze troubling user experiences that show the dangers of using an unregulated broker. Traders who want to see the evidence can find the full regulatory report and user complaints on the AssetsFX profile on WikiFX.

Breaking Down Company and Regulatory Information

To understand the risks, we need to look at the broker's official details and what it claims about regulation. While AssetsFX says it has been operating for 10-15 years, the details show major inconsistencies that need careful examination especially when evaluating AssetsFX Regulation and overall transparency.

Official Company Information

The broker is registered with these details, which give it a basic business identity but don't guarantee financial oversight or trader safety:

• Company Name: Assets Global Ltd

• Registered Location: Mauritius

• Claims to Operate: 10-15 years

• Registered Address: Level 6 Ken Lee Building, 20 Edith Cavell Street, Port Louis, Mauritius

It's important to understand that an offshore business registration, like this one in Mauritius, is not the same as a strong financial license from a top-level regulatory body. These registrations are often easier and cheaper to get and usually offer very little protection or legal help for traders if there are disputes, lost funds, or broker misconduct. This difference is key for understanding risk.

What Regulatory Watchdogs Say

The most important information about the AssetsFX License is the clear assessment from regulatory watchdogs. WikiFX's investigation, based on public information, concludes with these strong warnings:

• Main Status: No forex trading license found.

• Risk Warning: High potential risk.

• Overall Score: A very low score of 2.44/10 at the time of review, with the warning: “Please be aware of the risk!”

This lack of recognized regulation means the broker operates without oversight from a body that enforces important rules on keeping client funds separate, fair trading practices, having enough capital, or resolving disputes. For traders, this means almost no safety protection.

Looking at the Conflicting Claim

Adding to the confusion and risk, the broker's profile contains conflicting information. It claims to be regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius under license number GB23201811. However, this claim directly conflicts with WikiFX's “No Regulation” status and the “Suspicious Regulatory License” tag given to the broker.

This contradiction between the broker‘s self-declared AssetsFX Regulation and independent watchdog findings raises serious concerns. When there is inconsistency between a broker’s regulatory claims and third-party verification reports, traders should exercise extreme caution and independently verify the legitimacy of any stated AssetsFX License through official regulator databases before depositing funds.

Warning Signs in Real Life: User Complaints

The dangers of a broker's questionable regulatory status are not just theoretical. They show up as serious financial harm to clients. Looking at the “Exposure” section on WikiFX reveals a disturbing pattern of serious accusations against AssetsFX, turning abstract risks into real losses for traders.

These cases raise serious concerns about the credibility of AssetsFX Regulation and whether any valid AssetsFX License truly exists to protect traders.

Complaint 1: Trade Manipulation and Theft

One of the most serious complaints comes from a professional trader and founder of a capital management firm with over 15 years of experience. In a detailed post from June 2025, the trader describes what appears to be deliberate manipulation—something that would be far less likely under strict AssetsFX Regulation backed by a verifiable AssetsFX License.

• What Happened First: After depositing $10,000, a withdrawal request for $5,000 was canceled by AssetsFX without any explanation. The trader's messages were then ignored.

• Claimed Manipulation: Shortly after the canceled withdrawal, the trader discovered three fake trades had appeared on his MT5 account. He says that only he and the broker had account access, and he made no trades after the withdrawal request.

• The Outcome: These trades were allegedly manipulated to systematically wipe out his entire $10,000 balance. An analysis of the server data reportedly showed profit reductions on three specific Bitcoin trades totaling exactly $10,000. The trader provided the exact trade numbers: #7583356, #7583623, and #7584185.

• Broker's Response: When confronted, the support team allegedly dismissed the claim with the message, “You lost your money yourself!”

This detailed account, involving specific trade numbers and alleged backend manipulation, serves as a serious warning about the potential for total and deliberate fund loss.

Complaint 2: Insider Claims of Scams

The credibility of these negative claims is further supported by a report from someone identifying themselves as a former Country Manager for AssetsFX in Pakistan. This alleged insider's testimony, posted in April 2025, includes deeper concerns about internal practices and the authenticity of the brokers claimed AssetsFX License.

• Claims that the company systematically scams clients, particularly in the Pakistan region.

• A pattern of stopping withdrawals and then falsely accusing clients of “abuse trading” to justify keeping funds.

• An instance where a client's account was blocked immediately after a deposit, before a single trade was ever made.

A claim from someone who says they were a former manager, who would have had direct insight into the company's operations, raises serious questions about the broker's internal ethics and business practices. It suggests that such issues may be widespread rather than isolated incidents.

Complaint 3: Common Withdrawal Rejections

Beyond the large-scale allegations, there are more straightforward, yet equally concerning, reports of basic operational failures. For example, a trader from India reported in August 2025 that a $200 withdrawal was rejected without any reason provided. Furthermore, they noted that live customer support was unavailable to resolve the issue, leaving them with no way to get help.

These recurring withdrawal problems align closely with the risks associated with weak or nonexistent AssetsFX Regulation. When no authority monitors withdrawal compliance, brokers may delay or deny payments without consequence. The absence of accountability calls into question whether the advertised AssetsFX License offers any real investor protection.

For the latest updates, traders are encouraged to review the full “Exposure” section on the AssetsFX profile on WikiFX.

The Confusing Nature of Reviews

Many traders researching the company may notice a large number of positive reviews, which may appear to contradict serious complaints. However, when evaluating AssetsFX Regulation credibility, it is important to analyze review authenticity rather than simply counting positive feedback.

The Suspicious Review Pattern

While numerous positive reviews exist, they share several troubling characteristics that suggest they may not be authentic brokers public image management and its claimed AssetsFX License status.

• Geographic Concentration: A disproportionately high number of these reviews come from a single country, Bangladesh. This extreme concentration is unusual for a global broker and suggests a targeted campaign rather than natural global feedback.

• Generic Language: The praise is often vague, repetitive, and uses similar, non-specific phrases that could apply to any service. This contrasts sharply with the detailed, specific nature of the negative complaints.

• Common Phrases Used:

• “Nothing flashy, but it does the job well.”

• “Trust Earned, Not Claimed.”

• “A dependable choice for steady users.”

• “Quietly reliable.”

• “No unnecessary drama just stable, smooth performance.”

• Lack of Detail: Unlike the highly specific negative reports that mention deposit amounts, withdrawal issues, and even trade numbers, these positive reviews rarely mention concrete details about trade execution speeds, withdrawal amounts and processing times, or specific support interactions.

Such patterns are commonly associated with organized reputation campaigns. When a brokers AssetsFX Regulation status is unclear, artificially positive reviews cannot replace the protection that a legitimate AssetsFX License should guarantee.

Why Specific Accusations Matter

In risk assessment, it's important to weigh the quality of evidence, not just the quantity of reviews.

• Vague Praise vs. Specific Evidence: Generic positive reviews offer no checkable details and carry little weight. A review stating “it's reliable” is far less credible than a review stating “they manipulated trade #7583356 to reduce my profit by $4,000.”

· Detailed Allegations: Reports alleging backend manipulation or insider misconduct provide actionable details that regulators would normally investigate under structured AssetsFX Regulation systems.

When a broker operates without the oversight of a regulator, these detailed negative accounts should be given significant weight. They represent the real-world outcomes for traders when there is no authority to protect them from misconduct.

Conclusion: The Final Decision

Our investigation into the AssetsFX Regulation and AssetsFX License status leads to an unavoidable and deeply concerning conclusion. The evidence, drawn from the comprehensive WikiFX report and analysis of public data, paints a picture of a high-risk, unregulated operation that poses a substantial threat to investor money.

To summarize the key findings:

• No Valid Regulation: The broker is flagged as having no recognizable, valid forex trading license. Its offshore registration in Mauritius offers little to no investor protection, and its claim of an FSC license is marked as suspicious.

• Serious Accusations: There are credible, detailed user complaints alleging serious misconduct, including deliberate trade manipulation, fund theft, systematic withdrawal blocking, and unethical practices confirmed by a claimed insider.

• Suspicious Reviews: The large volume of positive reviews shows clear patterns that suggest manipulation and cannot be trusted to outweigh the specific, severe allegations of financial harm.

Therefore, the warning “Low score, please stay away!” appears to be a well-founded and wise directive. The combination of no meaningful regulation and severe, detailed user complaints makes AssetsFX a significant risk to any trader's money. We strongly advise all investors to prioritize their financial safety above all else. Before depositing funds with any broker, especially one with this many warning signs, perform your own research. A critical and non-negotiable step in this process is to thoroughly check the broker's complete, real-time profile and any new alerts on a trusted regulatory inquiry tool like WikiFX.