Abstract:IQ Option presents itself as a titan of the industry—slick apps, massive advertising campaigns, and an "AA" influence ranking that spans the globe. But beneath this polished veneer, our investigative team has uncovered a disturbing pattern emerging from hundreds of trader complaints. The data suggests a "roach motel" operational model: deposits are instant, but for a growing number of profitable traders, the exit doors are bolted shut.

IQ Option presents itself as a titan of the industry—slick apps, massive advertising campaigns, and an “AA” influence ranking that spans the globe. But beneath this polished veneer, our investigative team has uncovered a disturbing pattern emerging from hundreds of trader complaints. The data suggests a “roach motel” operational model: deposits are instant, but for a growing number of profitable traders, the exit doors are bolted shut.
Anonymity Disclaimer: All cases detailed below are based on real records lodged with WikiFX. Identities have been obscured to protect the traders involved.
In the world of trading, the ultimate goal is to win. However, recent records from 2025 indicate that on this platform, winning may be the quickest way to get banned.
Our analysis of recent inputs reveals a terrifying correlation: as soon as a trader generates significant profit, technical barriers appear instantly. One trader, who participated in a monthly tournament in September 2025, reported earning a substantial prize. Instead of a payout, they faced a brick wall. The platform allegedly requested a cascade of verification documents. Once provided, communication was cut, and the account was blocked. The profit—and the initial deposit—remained inside.
This is not an isolated incident. Reports from October 2025 describe traders growing their accounts from small deposits (e.g., $20 to over $50) only to find their withdrawal function disabled. When they attempted to transfer funds to bank cards, the transactions were marked as “Failed,” yet no explanation was given. Shortly after, access to the accounts was restricted entirely.

When silence doesn't work, the platform appears to deploy bureaucratic hurdles designed to exhaust the trader.
In a baffling case recorded in February 2025, a trader looking to withdraw funds was suddenly required to verify every credit card they had ever used to deposit funds over the history of their account. This included requests for photos of cards from four years ago—cards that had long since been destroyed, expired, or lost. Because the trader could not physically produce a plastic card from 2021, their current funds were held hostage.

Another disturbing mechanism involves the weaponization of bonuses. A case from March 2025 highlights a trader who accepted a small deposit bonus (approx. $17). After trading their account up to nearly $70, they decided to cancel the bonus to free up their withdrawal. The terms implied that only the bonus amount would be deducted. Instead, upon cancellation, the entire balance was wiped to zero, including the trader's own capital and profits.

IQ Option operates under a complex regulatory framework. While they tout their “regulated” status loudly, a closer look at the WikiFX regulatory database reveals a fractured picture. Traders must understand that a license in one jurisdiction does not guarantee safety in another, especially when warnings are flashing elsewhere.
The Regulatory Breakdown:
A recurring theme in almost every complaint from late 2024 through 2025 is the degradation of customer support. Traders report that the “Live Chat” functions work perfectly when asking how to deposit. However, once a withdrawal inquiry is lodged, response times stretch from hours to weeks.
One trader noted in May 2025 that after their withdrawal was canceled three times without reason, they sent all requested documents to the support email. The verification team confirmed receipt and approval, yet the withdrawal remained “frozen” for weeks. Eventually, the support team simply stopped replying.

Risk Warning
WikiFX Score: 5.47 / 10
While IQ Option holds a valid regulatory license in Cyprus, the sheer volume of severe complaints regarding withdrawals—specifically targeting profitable accounts—poses a critical risk. The existence of a license has not shielded recent traders from losing access to their capital.
The level of risk associated with this broker is currently High. Please exercise extreme caution.

Does your deposit amount fail to reflect in your Exnova forex trading account? Does the same thing happen even when withdrawing? Does the Exnova bonus lure lead to a NIL account balance? Has the broker terminated your account without any explanation? These trading issues have become synonymous with traders here. Some traders have openly criticized the broker on several review platforms online. In this Exnova review article, we have highlighted the miserable forex trading experiences.

Has your FortuixAgent app for forex trading been restricted? Does the broker not allow you to withdraw your initial deposits? Does the UK-based forex broker demand payment out of your earnings to allow withdrawals? These issues refuse to leave traders, as they come out expressing their frustration on broker review platforms. In this Fortuixagent review article, we have shared many complaints made against the broker.

The FCA warns of a "clone" broker impersonating Fortrade. Discover how to spot the scam and protect your funds with WikiFX.

A disturbing pattern has emerged from recent trader reports regarding Admirals (also known as Admiral Markets). While the broker holds valid licenses in some jurisdictions, a flood of recent complaints suggests a disconnect between their regulatory status and their treatment of client profits. Our investigation uncovers a "two-tier" reality: valid regulation on paper, but alleged profit withholding, opaque fee demands, and sudden leverage changes in practice.