Abstract:The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.

The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.
In accordance with the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA), unlisted companies are required to submit their Information Memorandums to the SC within seven days of presenting them to potential investors. The purpose of this process is to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations, safeguarding the interests of investors. However, the SC emphasized that merely creating or submitting an IM does not imply the Commissions endorsement, as companies must still undergo rigorous scrutiny before any approval is granted.

In a recent case, the SC uncovered that a company had deliberately misled investors by claiming it had submitted an IM to the Commission, hoping to bolster the credibility of its investment scheme. The company had not, in fact, submitted any such documentation, raising suspicions of fraud. The SC believes this could be part of a wider, coordinated scam designed to exploit investors' trust.
As soon as this fraudulent activity was discovered, the Securities Commission took swift action by reporting the company to law enforcement and adding it to the SCs Investor Alert List. This list is designed to inform the public about companies and individuals involved in dubious or illegal investment schemes. The SC considers such behaviour particularly dangerous, as it misleads investors into believing that the investment product is legitimate and has been reviewed or approved by the authorities.
The Securities Commission strongly urges the public to remain vigilant when evaluating any investment opportunities, especially those that claim to be associated with the SC or its officials. Investors are advised to carefully verify the legitimacy of any investment offer by consulting official sources or contacting the Commission directly.
Additionally, the SC encourages anyone who encounters suspicious investment activities or misleading information to report such cases promptly. By doing so, the public can help prevent others from falling victim to these potentially harmful scams, thus contributing to the overall protection of investors.


Is your trading experience with MYFX markets full of fund withdrawal denials despite repeated communications with its customer support team? Has the broker deleted all your profits? Did the broker accuse you of false trading strategy implementation while deleting your profits? There have been many such instances reported by traders against these activities online. In this MYFX Markets review article, we have shared some complaints. Take a look!

Exfor, a Malaysia-based forex broker, has allegedly been the centre of attention for all the wrong reasons. These include long-pending withdrawal denials, no communication or assistance from the broker’s customer support team, manipulated pricing upon a withdrawal request by the trader, and account blowups due to bonus-related issues. It’s the traders who allegedly bear the brunt of all these suspicious trading activities. A lot of them have criticized it on broker review platforms. We have highlighted some of their complaints in this Exfor review article. Take a look!

When choosing a broker, the most important question is: "Is my broker properly regulated and is my capital safe?" For Xlibre, the answer is straightforward but worrying. Based on detailed research from independent global regulatory checking platforms, Xlibre is not regulated by any major financial authority. This article looks at the main issues around Xlibre Regulation status, or more correctly, the lack of it. We will examine the truth behind the claimed Xlibre License and explain why its business setup has high-risk warning signs such as a "Suspicious Regulatory License" and very low trust scores from auditors. The goal of this research is to give a clear, fact-based analysis of Xlibre's company registration, its claims, and the real risks these create for traders' capital. While this article provides a detailed analysis, regulations can change. Traders should always check the most current information before working with any broker. You can find the detailed verification report for

Let's answer the main question right away: Is Xlibre a safe and trustworthy broker for traders? After carefully reviewing how it operates and checking its legal status, our answer is a clear no. We strongly advise against using Xlibre for trading. Our research shows that this company operates without proper financial oversight, has multiple serious warning signs, and faces complaints from users who claim the company has acted dishonestly with their funds. This decision isn't based on personal opinions but on facts we can verify. We used information from global broker research platforms such as WikiFX. These services help protect traders by collecting information about regulations, user experiences, and expert reviews in an easy-to-understand format. Before you invest in any broker, you should always check its status on one of these platforms. You can see all the information about Xlibre yourself on the Xlibre WikiFX page.