Abstract:The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.

The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.
In accordance with the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA), unlisted companies are required to submit their Information Memorandums to the SC within seven days of presenting them to potential investors. The purpose of this process is to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations, safeguarding the interests of investors. However, the SC emphasized that merely creating or submitting an IM does not imply the Commissions endorsement, as companies must still undergo rigorous scrutiny before any approval is granted.

In a recent case, the SC uncovered that a company had deliberately misled investors by claiming it had submitted an IM to the Commission, hoping to bolster the credibility of its investment scheme. The company had not, in fact, submitted any such documentation, raising suspicions of fraud. The SC believes this could be part of a wider, coordinated scam designed to exploit investors' trust.
As soon as this fraudulent activity was discovered, the Securities Commission took swift action by reporting the company to law enforcement and adding it to the SCs Investor Alert List. This list is designed to inform the public about companies and individuals involved in dubious or illegal investment schemes. The SC considers such behaviour particularly dangerous, as it misleads investors into believing that the investment product is legitimate and has been reviewed or approved by the authorities.
The Securities Commission strongly urges the public to remain vigilant when evaluating any investment opportunities, especially those that claim to be associated with the SC or its officials. Investors are advised to carefully verify the legitimacy of any investment offer by consulting official sources or contacting the Commission directly.
Additionally, the SC encourages anyone who encounters suspicious investment activities or misleading information to report such cases promptly. By doing so, the public can help prevent others from falling victim to these potentially harmful scams, thus contributing to the overall protection of investors.


Savexa, a Comoros-based brokerage firm, reportedly received mixed reviews from users across India. While some hailed its competitive spread and trade order execution capability, others report fake profit and constant deposit pressure. The negative Savexa reviews reportedly had more insights and depth, which called for an investigation. In this article, we have examined these reviews thoroughly and disclosed whether Savexa is regulated.

SEBI's board on September 24 approved a sweeping overhaul of portfolio management rules, opening PMS to foreign securities, IPOs and a new mutual-fund-only route called PRIM. But one X user with 101,000 followers flagged a structural change that could reshape how PMS products are sold: a 'platform PMS' can now host independent fund managers (IFMs), each running their own strategy on the PMS's licence. Under the new SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2026, replacing the 2020 framework, existing PMS can invest in foreign securities under both discretionary and non-discretionary mandates, according to multiple media reports. The allowed list includes listed equity, debt, REITs, overseas mutual funds, ETFs, index funds and foreign government debt. All of it stays bound by FEMA and RBI's Liberalized Remittance Scheme — so you still can't buy foreign ETFs in rupees. The PMS just becomes a wrapper.

A USD200 withdrawal complaint is not evidence of a current unpaid balance when its public page now says resolved. This review examines that distinction alongside a separate, live disclosure issue: AssetsFX displays different registration numbers for Assets Global Ltd. Readers in South Asia, particularly India, should establish the correct contracting entity before relying on payment promises or brand-level assurances.

INZO, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based brokerage entity, is facing numerous allegations from users worldwide. These allegations question the broker's credibility on withdrawal processing, bonus activation, and customer support. Allegations have circulated across several independent platforms such as WikiFX. This INZO review 2026 takes a close look at these complaints and reveals its regulatory status.