Abstract:The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.

The Malaysia Securities Commission (SC) has issued a formal alert, warning the public about a newly identified investment scam that uses fraudulent Information Memorandums (IM) to deceive potential investors. This scheme falsely claims that the companies involved have either submitted their IMs to the SC or received approval from the Commission, thereby creating a false sense of legitimacy around their investment offerings.
In accordance with the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA), unlisted companies are required to submit their Information Memorandums to the SC within seven days of presenting them to potential investors. The purpose of this process is to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations, safeguarding the interests of investors. However, the SC emphasized that merely creating or submitting an IM does not imply the Commissions endorsement, as companies must still undergo rigorous scrutiny before any approval is granted.

In a recent case, the SC uncovered that a company had deliberately misled investors by claiming it had submitted an IM to the Commission, hoping to bolster the credibility of its investment scheme. The company had not, in fact, submitted any such documentation, raising suspicions of fraud. The SC believes this could be part of a wider, coordinated scam designed to exploit investors' trust.
As soon as this fraudulent activity was discovered, the Securities Commission took swift action by reporting the company to law enforcement and adding it to the SCs Investor Alert List. This list is designed to inform the public about companies and individuals involved in dubious or illegal investment schemes. The SC considers such behaviour particularly dangerous, as it misleads investors into believing that the investment product is legitimate and has been reviewed or approved by the authorities.
The Securities Commission strongly urges the public to remain vigilant when evaluating any investment opportunities, especially those that claim to be associated with the SC or its officials. Investors are advised to carefully verify the legitimacy of any investment offer by consulting official sources or contacting the Commission directly.
Additionally, the SC encourages anyone who encounters suspicious investment activities or misleading information to report such cases promptly. By doing so, the public can help prevent others from falling victim to these potentially harmful scams, thus contributing to the overall protection of investors.


Backtesting remains one of the primary skills forex traders learn. By implementing a trading strategy based on historical currency pair price information, traders can view their past performance. The strategy leading to consistent profits during backtesting can raise confidence and lay a structured approach to the forex market. However, the path is not as simple as it may sound. Several traders tend to meet a harsh reality when transitioning to live trading. The strategy that seemed almost flawless on historical charts suddenly fails to deliver the results it did before. The sudden difference may not necessarily be because of a poor strategy. Rather, it indicates limitations concerning backtesting and several factors that play their part in a live market where conditions change frequently. It is thus important to understand these differences so that you can set realistic expectations and work on to achieve consistent success.

While searching for user reviews for Seacrest Markets, a South Africa-based brokerage entity, we came across some repeated complaint patterns about the alleged account disablement and the funds that were trapped in it. At the same time, users have complained that the broker unnecessarily extended the fund withdrawal review process to deny them their hard-earned funds. While they may be user allegations and not established facts yet, the emergence of many complaints against the brokerage firm calls for an in-depth investigation in this Seacrest Markets review.

We are living in the age of artificial intelligence, where everything including financial matters such as forex are rapidly influenced by this phenomenon. AI-powered tools are here to identify numerous trading opportunities and analyze thousands of data, all in seconds, becoming the preferred option for both retail and institutional traders. Regardless of its immense benefits, traders often question - Whether the AI can truly transform their forex trading experience or is it just like another technology offering scope for unrealistic expectations? While the AI can ensure faster trading and more informed decisions, it is never a sure shot way to profits. As a trader, you need to understand both the strengths and limitations of AI when it comes to generating real wealth.

Among the many DeltaFX complaints reviewed, the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) account lock during live trading was arguably the most prominent one. Secondly, a Turkish trader complained about the sudden closure of trades within five to six minutes. This raises suspicion over the trading manipulation at the broker. Looking further, we came across a complaint about the blockage of the trading account immediately after a deposit. In this DeltaFX review, we have examined several user allegations in 2026.