Abstract:In Japan, the government wants to go ahead with tax reform to scrap payments of taxes on unrealized gains from crypto holdings. This comes following a report that the cabinet approved a revision to the country’s tax regime for digital assets.

In Japan, the government wants to go ahead with tax reform to scrap payments of taxes on unrealized gains from crypto holdings. This comes following a report that the cabinet approved a revision to the countrys tax regime for digital assets.
Local reports revealed that the government came up with new tax reform a few days ago with the aim of possibly implementing the changes when the countrys financial year starts on April 1, 2024.
They need to submit the bill to lawmakers next month for the approval of the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors. Before the introduction of the changes, corporations were required to report cryptos held based on the difference between market value and book value, without regards to whether they sold the crypto.
The reform stipulates that they will only pay taxes on profits obtained whenever they sell cryptocurrencies, the same as what retail investors are required to do according to tax laws. The tax reform details were revealed in a document published by the government about two weeks ago.
About four months ago, Japans Financial Services Agency first submitted a plan to scrap unrealized gains tax on crypto profits. Scrapping the tax rules may encourage more firms to engage in activities related to Web3 in the country.
USDC issuer Circle has collaborated with Japan-based financial services company SBI Holdings to enhance stablecoin adoption and Web3 services in the country.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework