Abstract:Japan stocks were higher after the close on Tuesday, as gains in the Shipbuilding, Precision Instruments and Rubber sectors led shares higher.

Japan stocks were higher after the close on Tuesday, as gains in the Shipbuilding, Precision Instruments and Rubber sectors led shares higher.
At the close in Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 rose 0.07%.
The best performers of the session on the Nikkei 225 were LY Corp (TYO:4689), which rose 2.47% or 11.70 points to trade at 484.90 at the close. Meanwhile, Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd. (TYO:7735) added 2.22% or 255.00 points to end at 11,750.00 and Taiheiyo Cement Corp. (TYO:5233) was up 2.04% or 56.50 points to 2,827.50 in late trade.
The worst performers of the session were Odakyu Electric Railway Co., Ltd. (TYO:9007), which fell 4.22% or 93.50 points to trade at 2,122.50 at the close. Takashimaya Co., Ltd. (TYO:8233) declined 3.16% or 63.00 points to end at 1,930.50 and Mazda Motor Corp (TYO:7261) was down 2.61% or 40.50 points to 1,512.00.
Rising stocks outnumbered declining ones on the Tokyo Stock Exchange by 1858 to 1780 and 261 ended unchanged.
Shares in LY Corp (TYO:4689) rose to 52-week highs; rising 2.47% or 11.70 to 484.90.
The Nikkei Volatility, which measures the implied volatility of Nikkei 225 options, was up 1.73% to 17.10.
Crude oil for February delivery was up 0.26% or 0.19 to $73.75 a barrel. Elsewhere in commodities trading, Brent oil for delivery in March rose 0.27% or 0.21 to hit $79.01 a barrel, while the February Gold Futures contract rose 0.30% or 6.30 to trade at $2,075.40 a troy ounce.
USD/JPY was down 0.07% to 142.24, while EUR/JPY rose 0.07% to 156.82.
The US Dollar Index Futures was down 0.09% at 101.25.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework