Abstract:Smart-contract audit company CertiK has been awarded the sum of $500k by Sui Foundation for the discovery of a potential attack vector on the Sui network.

Smart-contract audit company CertiK has been awarded the sum of $500k by Sui Foundation for the discovery of a potential attack vector on the Sui network.
The firm discovered a vulnerability that a malicious smart contract can trigger, leading to an endless circle for the blockchains nodes, and paralysis of the network.
According to a press release from CertiK on June 19, the HamsterWheel attack is different from traditional attacks that shut down chains by crashing nodes. Instead, it works like something running on a hamster wheel by trapping all nodes in a state of ceaseless operation without processing new transactions.
It is capable of crippling entire networks and eventually making them inoperable. Chief security officer at CertiK, Kang Li, said that “the discovery of the HamsterWheel attack demonstrates the evolving sophistication of threats to blockchain networks”.
The Sui Foundation revealed that the identification of the bug will enable a team of developers to install two main measures capable of reducing the possible effect of a similar issue in the long run. They have rolled out fixes for the bug and a full technical report will be published later, said CertiK


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework