Abstract:The U.S. dollar edged slightly lower on Thursday in reduced European trading, as the U.S. and Italy joined a list of countries to require COVID-19 testing by incoming travelers from China.

The U.S. dollar edged slightly lower on Thursday in reduced European trading, as the U.S. and Italy joined a list of countries to require COVID-19 testing by incoming travelers from China.
As of 03:37 ET (08:37 GMT), the U.S. Dollar Index - which tracks the greenback against a basket of six other currencies - was lower by 0.22% to 104.24. That marked a paring back from earlier gains spurred on by a rise in benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury yields, which hit a more than one-month high overnight.
Authorities in Washington and Rome, as well as India, have now said that they will make people coming into these nations from China take COVID-19 tests.
Beijing had previously announced that it will remove quarantine rules for inbound travelers starting on January 8, sparking hopes that the world's second-largest economy may be moving past an era of strict coronavirus regulations. But this optimism is showing signs of fading as cases spread across the country.
The Chinese offshore yuan moved up more than 0.2% to 6.9791 against the dollar. The British pound rose 0.26% to 1.2044, but was hovering just under its December low of 1.1993, while the euro also bumped up 0.27% to 1.0637.
Presently, the Japanese yen rallied to 133.61 per dollar, nearly canceling out a loss of 0.7% on Wednesday. Analysts at Resona Holdings said an announcement from the BOJ earlier in December that it will loosen its 10-year Japanese government bond yield band has fuelled speculation that the central bank will tighten monetary policy further next year.
Somewhere the Russian ruble touched its lowest mark against the U.S. dollar since April, as worries increase that key export revenues will be hit by sanctions on the country's oil and gas.


Is your fund with JustMarkets, a Seychelles-based brokerage firm, stuck for weeks due to an unexplained validation reason? Did the broker limit your order entries? Did you see losses on the JustMarkets login due to an abnormal negative slippage on your trade? Did you face an unaccounted fund deduction by the broker? Several users have reported these issues on independent broker verification platforms such as WikiFX. This JustMarkets review examines these reported allegations and provides an overview of its regulatory framework.

This Azure Markets review examines an immediate verification problem: on 23 September 2026, the broker domain's regulations page returned 404, while its homepage showed only a server-status message. An older indexed registration claim and a reported USD84 withdrawal delay provide context, not proof of fraud or current authorisation. For South Asian readers, the practical question is what can still be verified independently.

Most of what a BazaarFx review turns up online is opinion. Two records are not. The UK Financial Conduct Authority published a warning naming this brand on 13 August 2025, and Companies House holds a registration for a company using the name. Neither record settles the question of BazaarFx regulation in the way marketing pages usually imply, and the two are often mistaken for each other. This check was carried out on 22 September 2026; each record carries its own date.

An XPO FUND review written from marketing copy will describe a funded-trader programme registered in the British Virgin Islands. The territory's own regulator describes something else. Its public statement of 16 March 2026 says the company behind the brand was never licensed there and had already been dissolved from the register. That single document changes how any claim about XPO FUND regulation should be read. This check was carried out on 22 September 2026; each record carries its own date.