Abstract:The founder of one of Russia’s largest cryptocurrency scams to date is behind bars, and his accomplices are being sought by Russian authorities. Moscow police arrested Kirill Doronin on charges of allegedly defrauding $100 million from his investors, although some reports purport the figure could be over $1 billion.

The founder of one of Russias largest cryptocurrency scams to date is behind bars, and his accomplices are being sought by Russian authorities. Moscow police arrested Kirill Doronin on charges of allegedly defrauding $100 million from his investors, although some reports purport the figure could be over $1 billion.
Finiko was established in the city of Kazan in 2019 and posed as a legitimate BTC investment firm. The scheme promised its investors ludicrous returns—in this case up to 30% monthly. It also claimed its investors would be able to purchase apartments and cars at discounts with the assistance of the founders, according to the Moscow Times.
In December 2020, Finiko released FNK, its native digital currency. As per local reports, the founders would take the BTC from the investors and award them the FNK tokens.
And while the promises of ludicrous returns brought in several investors, it was in its word-of-mouth incentives that Finiko managed to lure the most clients. It would award huge referral fees to those that brought in new clients. This led to many bringing in their close friends and relatives, and for many of the new clients, this was their first interaction with digital currencies.
Before his arrest, Doronin had attempted to flee to Turkey, going as far as obtaining Turkish citizenship under the name Onur Namik. Russian police have now put his co-conspirators Marat Sabirov, Zygmunt Zygmuntovich and Edward Sabirov on their wanted list.
In the case of Sabirov, authorities said his involvement in the scam has brought to focus his other ventures, with the biggest concern being a joint venture he was involved in with Nikolay Nikiforov, a former Russian minister for communications.
Its not yet clear how much money the fraudsters made away with. By some local reports, the amount was a mere 70 million Russian rubles ($1 million). However, there are others, like Russian business publication The Bell that puts the amount at over $100 million.
And then there is Sergey Mendeleev, the founder of Garantex exchange who believes that the amount the scammers made away with was 10 times higher. According to him, in January this year, the Finiko team withdrew $100 million in BTC in just one week, sending the “entire Moscow crypto market on fire.”
Blockchain intelligence firm Crystal Blockchain identified 111 million USDT, 1.8 million USDC and 888 ETH (worth $2.8 million) which it tied to Finikos wallet. The founder of the analytics firm Kyrylo Chykhradze told one outlet that some of the tokens were sent to Uniswap, a decentralized digital currency exchange.

FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.

Choosing a tier 1 liquidity forex is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how an institutional liquidity provider, bank liquidity forex, or interbank liquidity provider arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best tier 1 liquidity forex” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

MIFX review 2026: understand published commissions and spreads, the withdrawal process, Instant Withdrawal conditions, and the PT Monex Investindo Futures complaint route without turning community discussion into factual allegations.

Choosing a forex liquidity provider is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how a forex LP, FX liquidity provider, or liquidity provider forex arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best forex liquidity provider” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.