Abstract:U.S. banks are required to acquire written permission from their bank supervisors before engaging in certain activities that involve cryptocurrency, a key regulator stated on Tuesday.

U.S. banks are required to acquire written permission from their bank supervisors before engaging in certain activities that involve cryptocurrency, a key regulator stated on Tuesday.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said banks must show that they possess appropriate risk management tools before getting involved in activities like providing custody services for clients crypto holdings.
In a statement, acting Comptroller Michael Hsu said that “Because many of these technologies and products present novel risks, banks must be able to demonstrate that they have appropriate risk management systems and controls in place to conduct them safely.”
The regulators new position raised the bar for banks considering certain crypto activities.
The new interpretive letter prohibits banks from engaging in several crypto-related activities, such as providing custody for crypto assets, without giving their bank supervisors prior notice of their intent to partake in such activities.
Supervisors will then assess the banks risk management tools and systems before deciding whether or not to allow the bank to proceed with the activity.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

ABET, a Bulgaria-based brokerage firm, faces severe allegations from users for the reportedly inefficient way it handles their funds. While some alleged illegitimate account blocks by the broker, others reported fund scams and trade manipulations. These ABET reviews have raised question marks over the broker’s legitimacy.

22K Trader, a United Kingdom-based brokerage entity, is facing severe fund scam allegations from Indian users, in particular. One user reported losing as high as $26,500 on the platform. Similarly, other users have claimed different loss amounts while also criticizing the forced trade execution by the broker. In this 22K Trader review, we have examined several user allegations and provided the regulatory framework the broker operates under.

MaxPro365, a Costa Rica-based brokerage entity, is indeed accused of allegations concerning missing funds. The allegations have come specifically from Indian users. One striking claim we came across talked about missing funds worth $23,000. All of these allegations indicate a potential investment scam. In this Maxpro365 review, we have investigated several user allegations and provided an overview of the regulatory framework.