Home -
Exposure -
Main body -

WikiFX Express

Exness
TMGM
EC markets
XM
FXTM
FOREX.com
AVATRADE
GTCFX
IC Markets Global
D prime

NSFX Review 2026: License Status, Low WikiFX Score, User Complaints, and Failed Office Visit

WikiFX | 2026-04-21 14:47

Abstract:NSFX review 2026: WikiFX score 1.75/10, no valid forex license, revoked FCA status, former Malta license, user complaints, and no office found in WikiFX field survey.

NSFX is an old brokerage name registered in Malta, but a long operating history does not settle the question of current safety. On WikiFX, NSFX currently shows a very low score of 1.75/10, an Unverified status, and a questionable regulatory license warning.

For anyone reading an NSFX review, the key point is no longer the brokers past presence in the market. The more important issue is whether NSFX currently holds a valid forex license and whether its operational profile can still support trust.

The full NSFX broker page on WikiFX is available here:

https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0001544274.html

NSFX Basic Broker Information

The available company profile shows NSFX as a broker founded in 2004 and registered in Malta. Its listed market instruments include forex, commodities, and indices. The brokers platform is shown as NSFX JForex, with support for PC, web, and mobile access. MT4 and MT5 do not appear to be supported.

NSFX also appears to provide demo accounts and several account types, including ECN, Fixed Spread, and JForexaccounts. However, some key trading details, including leverage, spread structure, and minimum deposit information, are not clearly displayed in the available profile.

This makes the basic offer look limited compared with many brokers that publish clearer trading conditions. For a broker handling client funds, account terms and platform details should be easy to verify before a user makes any funding decision.

NSFX Rating on WikiFX

According to the WikiFX broker profile, NSFX has an operating history of 10–15 years and currently carries a score of 1.75/10. The rating breakdown shows:

  • Regulation: 0.00
  • License: 0.00
  • Business: 8.00
  • Software: 4.74
  • Risk Control: 0.00

This rating structure is weak on the most important parts of the profile. The business score appears relatively high, but the regulation, license, and risk-control scores are all 0.00. For any NSFX rating analysis, that is the central issue.

A broker may have operated for years, but if its current license status is no longer valid and its risk-control score is zero, the historical operating period offers limited reassurance.

NSFX License Status: No Valid Forex License Found

The most important concern in this NSFX license review is straightforward: NSFX currently does not show a valid forex license on WikiFX.

The broker page marks NSFX as Unverified and lists a questionable regulatory license warning. The current license and regulation scores are both 0.00, which means the brokers present regulatory profile does not support a valid active forex license.

Former Malta License

NSFX previously had a Malta regulatory background, and earlier records may have shown a verifiable Malta-related license status. However, the current WikiFX profile does not present NSFX as holding a valid active forex license. In the present review context, the former Malta status should not be relied on as proof of current authorization.

FCA Status No Longer Active

The FCA status also needs to be read in the present tense.

According to the regulatory information provided, NSFX Limited, reference number 595195, was previously an EEA-based company allowed to operate in the UK through passporting rights. The current FCA status shows that the company is no longer authorised to conduct regulated business in the UK.

That means old FCA references should not be treated as proof of current UK authorization. For traders reviewing NSFX license information, the current status matters more than historical references.

WikiFX Field Survey: No Office Found in Malta

A WikiFX field survey also raises concerns about NSFXs physical presence.

According to the survey report, the WikiFX team visited the listed address in Malta but did not find a confirmed NSFX office at the location. The address appeared to be residential, and the team was unable to verify that the broker maintained an actual office there.

The full field survey report can be viewed here:

https://www.wikifx.com/en/survey/2522676edc.html

This field result becomes more relevant when read together with the current unverified status, the absence of a valid forex license, and user accusations.

User Complaints and Withdrawal Concerns

The complaint record around NSFX is one of the strongest risk signals.

According to the related WikiFX article, multiple users have accused NSFX of serious issues, including withdrawal problems and suspected misconduct. These claims should be read carefully, but they cannot be ignored when they appear alongside weak regulatory visibility.

Related WikiFX article:

https://www.wikifx.com/en/newsdetail/202604179364390264.html

The concern is not only that users complained. The more important issue is the nature of the complaints. When reports involve account access, withdrawals, trading restrictions, or communication failures, they directly affect the safety of funds and the reliability of broker operations.

Is NSFX Safe?

Based on the available information, NSFX does not present a reassuring profile.

The broker has a long operating history and a recognizable name, but the current risk signals are significant:

  • WikiFX score of 1.75/10
  • Unverified status
  • No valid forex license found
  • Regulation score of 0.00
  • License score of 0.00
  • Risk-control score of 0.00
  • FCA permission no longer active
  • former Malta license no longer supporting current authorization
  • WikiFX field survey found no confirmed office
  • user accusations reported in WikiFX coverage

This profile does not require dramatic language. The facts already point to a broker that should be treated with strong caution.

Final Assessment

A fair NSFX review should separate historical presence from current authorization.

NSFX has been in the market for years and still presents itself as a forex-related broker. However, the current WikiFX profile shows a very low rating, no valid forex license, and major weaknesses in regulation and risk control. The inactive FCA status, former Malta license background, failed field survey, and user complaints all add pressure to the brokers current profile.

For traders checking NSFX rating, NSFX license, or concerns around NSFX scam reports, the practical conclusion is clear: do not rely on old brand history or past regulatory references alone. Current authorization, office presence, complaint record, and withdrawal reliability should all be reviewed carefully before any account is funded.

#BrokerReview

Related broker

Unverified
NSFX
Company name:Alchemy Markets Ltd
Score
1.75
Website:https://www.nsfx.com/
10-15 years | Questionable Regulatory License | Self-developed | Suspicious Operational Region
Score
1.75

Read more

Markets.com Review 2026: WikiFX Rating, License Status, Complaints, and Risk Signals

Is markets.com safe? A review of its WikiFX rating, CySEC license, unverified records, and user complaints about deposits and withdrawals.

Original 2026-04-23 15:27

SOUQ CAPITAL Review 2026: A Platform That Claims Regulation, but the Actual Signals Are Concerning

SOUQ CAPITAL presents itself as a regulated multi-asset broker, but its profile, regulatory warning, and licence claims point to a much higher level of risk than the branding suggests.

Original 2026-04-17 17:26

Spread Co Review 2026: Rating, License, Complaints, and Risk Signals

Spread Co review 2026: FCA license, WikiFX score 6.88/10, user complaints about withdrawals and taxes, unconfirmed office visit, and Indonesia blocking record.

Original 2026-04-15 17:43

Equiti Review 2026: Rating, License, Complaints, and Scam Risk Signals

Equiti review 2026: WikiFX score 5.06/10, CySEC and Seychelles licenses, CNMV warning, withdrawal complaints, clone alerts, and the Mediatrix lawsuit context.

Original 2026-04-14 14:24

WikiFX Express

Exness
TMGM
EC markets
XM
FXTM
FOREX.com
AVATRADE
GTCFX
IC Markets Global
D prime

WikiFX Broker

FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
ATFX

ATFX

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
CPT Markets

CPT Markets

Regulated
FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
ATFX

ATFX

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
CPT Markets

CPT Markets

Regulated

WikiFX Broker

FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
ATFX

ATFX

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
CPT Markets

CPT Markets

Regulated
FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
ATFX

ATFX

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
CPT Markets

CPT Markets

Regulated

Latest News

EC Markets Reports Record $5.13 Trillion Q1 Volume in 2026

WikiFX
2026-04-27 11:00

When Scammers Forge a Minister's Signature: Malaysia's Fake Investment Letter Exposed

WikiFX
2026-04-27 11:49

Malaysia Takes Aim at Online Scams: New Laws and a Unified Task Force on the Horizon

WikiFX
2026-04-27 12:03

AI Powered, Nearly Invisible: How Crypto Scammers Are Evolving with NEW Tactics

WikiFX
2026-04-27 12:12

How Trading Volume Tells You If a Price Move is Real

WikiFX
2026-04-27 11:30

The MSquare Review: Forged Blockchain Receipts, Frozen Accounts, and Severe Anomalies Exposed

WikiFX
2026-04-27 11:30

Why Judging Trades by Profit Teaches the Wrong Lesson

WikiFX
2026-04-27 11:30

Is LHCM Regulation Legitimate? FCA License Verification

WikiFX
2026-04-27 16:31

ROCO Regulation: Is ROCO Broker Safe for Forex Trading?

WikiFX
2026-04-27 14:48

Land Prime User Reputation: A Complete Look at Complaints and User Reviews

WikiFX
2026-04-27 15:03

Rate Calc

USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0

Amount

USD

Available

CNY
Calculate

You may also like

Apex Finance

Apex Finance

Risen

Risen

XERA PRIME

XERA PRIME

CinmaniaGlobal

CinmaniaGlobal

GLEX

GLEX

AVENTIS

AVENTIS

FINCREST

FINCREST

Tradovas

Tradovas

ASSET BRIDGE

ASSET BRIDGE

Bitminifirms

Bitminifirms