天眼评分

1.46 /10
Danger

GCMAsia · 国汇亚洲

澳大利亚

2-5年

监管牌照存疑

白标MT4

高级风险隐患

C

添加交易商

对比

我要曝光

曝光

在线开户
官方网址

天眼评分

监管指数0.00

业务指数6.62

风控指数0.00

软件指数4.00

牌照指数0.00

在线开户
官方网址
提示:天眼评分过低,请远离! 5
上次检测 : 2024-09-19
  • 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效监管,请注意风险!
  • 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到1条,请注意风险,谨防受害!

天眼鉴定

用户评价

More

用户评论

2

条评论

发布评价

firefists
超过1年
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company. In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company. In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
翻译成简体中文
2023-04-03 18:37
回复
0
0
firefists
超过1年
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia. While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia. While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
翻译成简体中文
2023-04-03 18:37
回复
0
0