Abstract:FIBOGROUP carries offshore regulation only, a low WikiFX score of 3.57, and a surge of user complaints alleging missing deposits, withdrawal barriers, severe slippage, and unresponsive support. Traders should treat this broker as high risk until withdrawal and execution disputes are independently resolved.

A trader said they were “eagerly persuaded” to deposit funds into FIBOGROUP. The money allegedly did not appear. They opened another account, deposited again, and reported the same result.
That is the kind of review that should stop any retail trader cold.
Our investigation into FIBOGROUP found a dangerous split screen. On one side, the broker advertises familiar platforms like MT4, MT5, and cTrader, plus account entry from as low as 1 cent. On the other side, recent user reports describe missing deposits, withdrawal obstacles, severe slippage, order deletion, and customer service silence.
This is not a small warning sign. It is a pattern traders cannot ignore.
FIBOGROUP is presented as a British Virgin Islands broker established in 2010. The company is listed under the Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission, with license number SIBA/L/14/1063.
But here is the key point for everyday Forex traders: this is offshore regulation. Offshore oversight may not provide the same level of investor protection, dispute handling, or compensation mechanisms that traders expect from stronger onshore regimes.
| Regulator | License Type | REAL STATUS |
|---|---|---|
| Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission | Offshore financial regulation, License No. SIBA/L/14/1063 | Offshore Regulation |
FIBOGROUPs WikiFX score is 3.57. Its influence rating is C. Our investigation also found that WikiFX received 17 complaints about this broker in the past three months.
That number matters. A single bad review may be noise. A cluster of recent complaints points to pressure building around the brokers operations.
The most alarming recent complaint came from a user in the Netherlands. The user claimed they deposited funds after being persuaded to fund the account, but the money did not reflect. They then opened another account and reported the same issue again.

A second user from Ukraine wrote that they had traded many positions “to no avail” and claimed the broker had taken their money. The wording is emotional, but the risk signal is clear: the user believed their funds and trading activity had not been treated fairly.

These complaints sit beside the brokers own low entry barriers. FIBOGROUP lists several account types, including MT5 Cent and MT4 Cent accounts with entry conditions from 1 cent. Low entry can attract new traders. But low entry does not reduce the need for strong fund handling, transparent execution, and reliable withdrawals.
For small traders, even a small blocked or missing deposit hurts.
Withdrawal complaints are the strongest danger signal in any broker review. Trading losses can happen. Market volatility can happen. But when a trader says they cannot withdraw, the risk moves from market risk to platform risk.
One user from the United Kingdom said it was difficult to place a withdrawal and receive it quickly. They described the process as time-consuming, filled with ads, and requiring unnecessary information not needed for withdrawal.

Another user from Belgium made an even sharper allegation: there was “no withdrawal button” on the website, meaning they could not withdraw, and customer service was not responding.

FIBOGROUPs customer service is listed across multiple languages and channels, including phone, email, social media, QQ, and other contact points. The broker is described as providing many replies, though with potentially long waiting times.
But user complaints allege a more serious gap. If a trader cannot find a withdrawal function and support does not answer, the number of contact channels becomes less reassuring.
The complaints are not limited to withdrawals. Several users reported execution problems that can directly damage a trading account.
A user from India claimed FIBOGROUP deleted an MSFT position during non-trading time after margin was not changed until after the U.S. market closed. The user said the platform refused to respond and alleged the action caused heavy losses.

A user from Belgium reported 32 instances where the platform executed trades at worse prices than requested, sometimes by more than 10 pips. They claimed the total cost was over $400 in losses.

Another user from Italy said severe slippage was “not occasional” and claimed trades were consistently executed at worse prices over two months.

FIBOGROUP offers leverage as high as 1:5000 on Forex and metals for certain accounts. High leverage can magnify gains. It can also magnify damage when slippage, wide spreads, or forced order changes appear.
In a high-leverage Forex environment, execution quality is not a minor detail. It is survival.
Not every user review was negative. Some users praised FIBOGROUP.
One user from India said they could recommend the platform and had traded there for years. Another said a welcome bonus issue was solved through live chat. A Nigerian user wrote that deposits and withdrawals worked fine, though verification took a little long and deposit methods were limited.
These reviews matter. They show that some traders report normal service.
But positive reviews do not cancel severe complaints. A broker can work for some users while creating serious trouble for others. The protective question is simple: what happens when something goes wrong?
Recent complaints suggest that when funds, withdrawals, or execution disputes arise, some users feel exposed.
FIBOGROUP has real platform infrastructure. It offers MT4, MT5, and cTrader. It lists eight account types. It supports mobile, web, and desktop trading. It also provides multilingual support channels.
But safety is not measured by platform names alone.
A broker must protect deposits. It must process withdrawals clearly. It must execute trades fairly. It must respond when users raise serious disputes.
Our investigation found too many unresolved warning signs around FIBOGROUP to treat it as low risk. The offshore regulation status, low WikiFX score, and recent complaints create a troubling profile.
For retail traders, the verdict is cautious and firm: do not be blinded by low deposits, high leverage, or familiar trading software. Before funding any account with FIBOGROUP, test withdrawals with small amounts, document every transaction, keep screenshots, and avoid adding more capital if a deposit, withdrawal, or execution issue appears.
In Forex, the first rule is not profit.
It is getting your money back.
