Long Asia Group Review 2026: Withdrawal Complaints, Unverified Regulation, and High Risk

Long Asia Group currently displays high-risk signals, including unverified regulatory licenses and a very low WikiFX score of 1.62. Recent user complaints highlight platform traps and ignored withdrawal requests, leaving traders with little protection. Indian traders should verify these red flags carefully before opening an account or sharing money.

In this Long Asia Group review, the main focus is not on trading features, but on whether the available evidence suggests a safe environment for your funds. Established around 2017 with ties to Singapore, this broker has recently generated alarming signals. For anyone comparing Forex options, the key is to separate advertised trading access from verified safety information.

Regulation and Safety

The available regulation details matter because weak oversight can leave traders with fewer options when withdrawals or account disputes arise. According to WikiFX data, Long Asia Group claims to hold licenses from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Indonesias ICDX. However, both of these claims currently hold an “unverified” status.

For Indian traders, this lack of confirmed regulation is a major red flag. Without a recognized, valid regulatory body actively overseeing the broker's operations, funds are unlikely to be protected in the event of insolvency, and dispute resolution channels are largely non-existent.

WikiFX Score and Overall Risk Signals

Currently, WikiFX information indicates a critically low score of 1.62 out of 10 for Long Asia Group. This low rating reflects the unverified licensing structure and a sudden spike in negative user feedback. The system flagged 26 complaints within a recent three-month window. This sheer volume of warnings means potential clients must pause and thoroughly reconsider the safety of this platform before committing capital.

Trader Complaints and Withdrawal Issues

User complaints describe a very frustrating experience with deposits and support. In one specific exposure case, a trader reported requesting a $500 withdrawal that simply vanished. https://h8imgs.zy223.com/app/2024/03/1658486181/20240327_996707.png

After initiating the transfer, the user noted that customer service stopped responding completely—a tactic commonly referred to as “ghosting.” The trader explicitly warned others not to trust the platform, pointing out that because the broker operates from Southeast Asia without regulatory bounds, retrieving lost funds becomes nearly impossible.

Platform Access and Login Safety

The same user complaint alleged that the brokers app and website operate as a “trap” for deposits. Before using any Long Asia Group login page, traders should make sure they are on the official website and highly scrutinize the platform's security environment. With email-only customer service (cs@alongasialiquidity.com) handling inquiries and a documented track record of ignoring users after they deposit, risking your credential security or funding an account here appears highly unsafe.

Final Verdict: Should Indian Traders Trust Long Asia Group?

Based on the available WikiFX data and user exposure cases, Long Asia Group presents a high level of risk. The combination of unverified regulatory licenses, a 1.62 risk score, and documented complaints regarding blocked $500 withdrawals suggests this broker is entirely unsafe for Indian retail traders at this time. Missing trading condition data—such as exact leverage limits, account types, and spreads—further highlights a broader lack of corporate transparency.

Status changes daily. Before depositing, check the WikiFX App for the latest real-time certificate and broker risk updates.