Abstract:Quotex receives a low safety score of 1.52/10 due to its unregulated status and multiple investor warnings from authorities like BAPPEBTI and CMVM. User feedback highlights severe issues including deposit failures, account suspensions upon profit generation, and withdrawal obstructions.
In this in-depth review, we analyze the key metrics, safety protocols, and user feedback surrounding Quotex, an online trading provider headquartered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The broker was established in 2020 and has quickly garnered attention, though not entirely for positive reasons. With a remarkably low WikiFX score of 1.52, the entity is flagged for high potential risk. This review aims to dissect the regulatory voids and operational red flags that traders must consider before committing funds. Currently, Quotex holds no valid regulatory license, and its influence rank remains at a 'C' level, despite average popularity in regions like Canada and Ecuador.
The most critical aspect of our audit is the regulation operates under, or in this case, the lack thereof. Quotex is registered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for loose oversight that does not police forex or binary options brokers. Consequently, the firm is officially classified as “Unregulated” on WikiFX.
More concerning are the specific warnings issued by tier-1 and tier-2 financial authorities. The Indonesian regulator, BAPPEBTI, has flagged the platform, blocking its domains and categorizing its operations as gambling under the guise of trading. Similarly, the Portuguese CMVM and the Malaysian SCM have issued warnings stating that Quotex is not authorized to provide financial services. Without regulation oversight, client funds are not segregated, and there is no compensation scheme in the event of insolvency. This lack of legal accountability significantly elevates the risk profile for any prospective client.
For traders focusing on Forex instruments, the trading environment at Quotex appears opaque. The broker does not publicly disclose detailed specifications regarding spreads or maximum leverage on its main summary pages, a common trait among low-transparency offshore entities. However, user feedback suggests inconsistencies in the trading conditions provided.
Specifically, one user (Case 5) reported that their leverage was unexpectedly decreased after they began trading, which directly impacts risk management strategies. This raises a pivotal question: Does Forex pricing compete with top-tier providers? Without transparent, verifiable data on spreads and commissions, it is difficult to validate the cost-efficiency of the platform. Furthermore, BAPPEBTI‘s classification of the platform’s operations suggests a model closer to binary options—often termed “fixed time trades”—rather than the standard spot Forex market structure used by regulated brokers.
Evaluating the `casesText` data reveals a disturbing pattern of financial disputes. Over the last three months alone, WikiFX has received 9 formal complaints. The grievances generally fall into two categories: deposit failures and withdrawal denials.



Quotex utilizes a proprietary web-based trading platform and mobile application. While proprietary platforms can offer unique features, they lack the third-party auditing and transparency of standard software like MetaTrader 4 or 5.
Security regarding account access is also a concern. To access the platform, traders must complete the login security steps, but as noted in the user complaints, the stability of this access is not guaranteed if the broker decides to freeze an account. As a broker entity operating without oversight, Quotex retains full control over the software backend, meaning they can potentially manipulate pricing or access rights without external accountability. This “black box” environment is a significant disadvantage compared to regulated platforms where trade execution is audited.
Quotex presents a high-risk environment for traders. With a score of 1.52, no regulatory license, and confirmed warnings from financial authorities in Indonesia, Portugal, and Malaysia, the platform fails to meet basic safety standards. The numerous complaints regarding missing deposits and frozen withdrawals further corroborate the regulatory warnings.
Recommendation: We strongly advise traders to avoid unregulated entities. For real-time updates on regulation status or to verify the official login page of safer alternatives, consult the WikiFX App.