Abstract:Capital.com secures a Kenyan CMA licence and appoints Samwel Kiraka as CEO, marking a major step in its Africa expansion strategy.

Capital.com has finally expanded its global presence by launching operations in Kenya after obtaining an official licence from the Capital Markets Authority (CMA). With this approval, the trading platform is now authorized to operate as a Dealing Online Foreign Exchange Broker, enabling it to offer regulated forex and trading services to Kenyan clients.
To lead the newly established entity, Capital.com has appointed Samwel Kiraka as Chief Executive Officer for its Kenyan branch. Kiraka will be responsible for implementing local governance frameworks, ensuring compliance with CMA requirements, and overseeing day-to-day operations.

He noted that the company‘s immediate goal is “to build local operations that meet regulatory and operational expectations from day one,” emphasizing Capital.com’s commitment to transparency and market integrity.
Capital.coms entry into Kenya adds another milestone to its expanding global regulatory portfolio. The firm already holds licences in the United Kingdom, Cyprus, Australia, the Bahamas, and the United Arab Emirates. Recent filings also confirm applications for additional approvals in South Africa, Japan, and Turkey, indicating an accelerated growth strategy focused on multi-jurisdictional compliance.
Executive Director Valentina Rzheutskaya explained that operating under domestic regulatory supervision remains central to the companys long-term strategy. “The CMA licence provides a clear framework for how we operate—defining standards for risk communication, client support, and operational controls,” she said.

Kenya has emerged as a dynamic hub for online trading in Africa, attracting several international brokers eager to capture the growing retail investor base. Firms such as IC Markets, FP Markets, Pepperstone, Exness, Admirals, INGOT Brokers, Scope Markets, and Exinity are all licensed by the CMA and have already established local offices.
Industry analysts suggest that Capital.coms entry reinforces a trend among global brokers seeking tighter regulatory alignment in emerging markets. With stronger oversight, these entities aim to enhance investor trust while ensuring compliance with evolving regional financial frameworks.
Founded with a mission to make trading more accessible and transparent, Capital.com operates a multi-asset platform serving clients worldwide. Its expansion into Kenya underscores the companys continued pursuit of responsible global growth grounded in regulatory compliance and client protection.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.
The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.