Abstract:Doo Group rebrands its UK and South Africa entities to RKX, reflecting regulatory updates and broader strategic changes.

Doo Group has rebranded its United Kingdom and South Africa-based operations under the trade name RKX. The change follows earlier adjustments in which the group renamed its prime services division from Doo Prime to D Prime, indicating a continued focus on brand restructuring within the financial services sector.
Companies House records show that the UK-registered entity formerly known as Doo Clearing has been renamed RKX Financial. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also been updated with the new trade name. The groups ownership structure remains unchanged, suggesting the rebrand is organizational rather than structural.

The UK website for RKX is not yet active, but the South African platform is operational. It specifies that services are available only to “professional clients and eligible counterparties,” excluding retail traders. The offering includes contracts for differences (CFDs) across forex, indices, commodities, metals, and cryptocurrencies, with leverage levels reaching up to 1:1,000.
The rebranding follows broader developments within Doo Group. In 2024, the company obtained a Cyprus licence and opened a second office on the island. Later reports indicated that its brokerage arm vacated the Limassol office after staff reductions.
The group also maintains operations in Malaysia, where authorities conducted inspections last year as part of a nationwide campaign against illegal call centres. While Doo was not directly implicated, the inspections highlight regulatory pressures in the region.
Doo Group has continued to expand in Asia. A subsidiary recently obtained a money lenders licence in Hong Kong, allowing it to operate within the jurisdictions financial services sector. The group also secured an Indonesian licence in 2024, strengthening its presence in Southeast Asia.
Doo Group operates across multiple jurisdictions with services spanning brokerage, prime offerings, and lending. The rebranding to RKX reflects ongoing adjustments to regulatory landscapes and brand positioning in competitive global markets.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework