Abstract:Cyprus broker SquaredFinancial winds down CySEC CIF license, shifting FX broker and CFDs clients amid regulatory transition.

Cyprus‑based FX broker SquaredFinancial has announced the termination of its CySEC CIF License, marking a significant regulatory transition for the firm. The move underscores shifting compliance strategies among Cyprus brokers as they balance local oversight with offshore operations.
The decision affects clients trading CFDs and other leveraged products under the CySEC framework. SquaredFinancial confirmed a structured client wind‑down process, ensuring transparency and regulatory alignment.
Key steps in the transition:

The withdrawal highlights growing challenges for Cyprus brokers operating under CySECs tightening rules. Enhanced oversight on leverage, marketing, and investor protection has prompted several firms to reconsider their licensing structures.
Industry analysts note that offshore operations often provide greater flexibility but raise questions about investor safeguards compared to EU‑regulated environments.
CySECs CIF License framework has long been a cornerstone for FX brokers in Cyprus, offering access to European markets under MiFID II. However, stricter compliance demands—ranging from capital adequacy to transparency in CFD trading—have accelerated exits.
SquaredFinancials transition reflects:
For retail and professional traders, the shift requires careful consideration of broker choice. While offshore entities may continue offering CFDs, clients lose the protections afforded by CySECs EU regulatory umbrella.
Investors are advised to:
SquaredFinancials exit from its CySEC CIF License signals a broader industry trend of regulatory recalibration. The firm has emphasized clear communication with clients during the wind‑down, reinforcing the importance of transparency in financial services.


When choosing a broker, the most important question is always: "Are my funds safe?" The answer depends on the broker's regulatory framework. For a company like AMarkets, which has been operating since 2007, understanding its licensing isn't just about checking a box. It's about understanding what that regulation truly means for your protection as a trader. This article provides a clear, detailed breakdown of AMarkets' licenses, what their offshore status really means, the extra safety measures it uses, and the risks you need to consider. We will go beyond marketing claims to give you factual, balanced information about their official licenses and other trust signals, helping you make a smart decision.

The question "Is AMarkets safe?" is the most important thing any trader can ask before investing. Putting your capital in a trading company requires a lot of trust, and the answer isn't simply yes or no. It's complicated and depends on understanding how the company works, what protections they have, and their past performance. To give you a clear answer, we've done a complete safety review of AMarkets. Our research looks at three main areas, each examining a different part of the company's safety. We'll share what we found using facts you can check, so you can make your own smart decision about whether your capital will be safe.

NPE Market review shows blocked accounts, no regulation, and low trust—best to stay away.

This article gives you a complete, fair look at ZarVista (now called Zarvista Capital Markets as of September 2024). We'll examine what users say, check the company's legal status, and investigate the biggest problems users report. Our goal is to give you clear, factual information so you can make a smart decision based on evidence, not just marketing promises. We'll look at both the good services they offer and the serious issues you need to think about carefully.