Abstract:A disturbing pattern has emerged from recent trader reports regarding Admirals (also known as Admiral Markets). While the broker holds valid licenses in some jurisdictions, a flood of recent complaints suggests a disconnect between their regulatory status and their treatment of client profits. Our investigation uncovers a "two-tier" reality: valid regulation on paper, but alleged profit withholding, opaque fee demands, and sudden leverage changes in practice.
WikiFX Investigation | For Public Protection
A disturbing pattern has emerged from recent trader reports regarding Admirals (also known as Admiral Markets). While the broker holds valid licenses in some jurisdictions, a flood of recent complaints suggests a disconnect between their regulatory status and their treatment of client profits. Our investigation uncovers a “two-tier” reality: valid regulation on paper, but alleged profit withholding, opaque fee demands, and sudden leverage changes in practice.
Anonymity Disclaimer: All cases cited in this article are based on real records lodged with the WikiFX Support Center. Identities have been hidden to protect trader privacy.
The most alarming trend in our recent data involves traders who successfully generated profits, only to have them wiped out overnight.
Multiple traders have reported a nearly identical scenario to WikiFX. After trading for approximately one month and generating significant returns—in some cases upwards of $9,000—their accounts were suddenly placed under review. The broker allegedly flagged these accounts for violating “Terms and Conditions,” specifically citing “price errors” or “latency” issues.
One trader described the experience: “I traded normally for a month with no warnings. I did not use scalping or bonuses. As soon as I tried to withdraw profits, they claimed I violated policy 5.10, returned my initial deposit, but deleted all my winnings.”
This creates a “heads I win, tails you lose” environment. If the trader loses money, the broker keeps it. If the trader wins, the broker allegedly invokes a vague technical clause to cancel the trades retroactively. Despite requests for proof regarding these “wrong prices,” traders report that the broker frequently fails to provide comparative data from other liquidity providers to substantiate the claim.
While one group of traders faces profit deletion, another group faces what appears to be an endless cycle of fees. Reports indicate that when some users attempted to withdraw funds, they were hit with requests for external payments.
According to the complaints, support agents demanded a “30% tax” on profits to be paid upfront—not deducted from the balance, but deposited fresh. When one trader complied and paid the tax, the goalposts moved again: they were then asked to pay a “10% conversion fee.”
Critical Risk Note: legitimate, regulated brokers typically deduct necessary fees or taxes directly from the account balance. Demanding external transfers for “insurance,” “taxes,” or “verification” before releasing funds is a major red flag often associated with high-risk anomalies or clone platforms.
The issues are not limited to retail traders facing withdrawal blocks. Even seasoned professionals are reporting abrupt changes to trading conditions.
In a recent 2025 report, a professional status trader claimed their status was revoked without notification. Consequently, their leverage was slashed from professional levels down to 1:30. This sudden margin requirement shift allegedly caused a forced liquidation of positions, resulting in a reported loss of nearly 20,000 in currency. This incident highlights a lack of communication that can be devastating for high-volume traders completely relying on stable margin environments.
Admirals presents a complex regulatory picture. They possess top-tier licenses, but they also utilize offshore entities for many international clients. Crucially, several global regulators have issued warnings or blacklisted specific operations associated with the brand.
Verified & Regulated:
Unverified/No Activity:
Warnings & Blacklists (Risk Signals):
Risk Warning
Traders should be aware that holding a license in the UK or Cyprus does not automatically protect clients onboarded through an offshore entity (like Seychelles). The behavior reported—specifically the retroactive cancellation of profits and demands for external tax payments—indicates a high risk. Whether these are the actions of the main broker or clone entities, the danger to your capital is real. Exercise extreme caution.
Does trading on Investing24.com data cause you losses? Do you frequently encounter interface-related issues on the Investing24.com app? Did you witness an annual subscription charge at one point and see it non-existent upon checking your forex trading account? Did the app mislead you by charging fees for strong buy ratings and causing you losses? You are not alone! Traders frequently oppose Investing24.com for these and more issues. In this Investing24.com review article, we have examined many such complaints against the forex broker. Have a look!
Contemplating 24option as your forex trading companion? Want to explore its trading platforms? We appreciate your interest! But how about knowing the Hong Kong-based forex broker and its different aspects, such as withdrawals and deposits. More specifically, if we have to say, what’s the feedback of traders concerning 24option? Are they happy trading with the broker? From a healthy collection of over 200 reviews, the broker is found to be a SCAM! Many traders have expressed concerns over the illegitimate trading approach adopted by the broker. In the 24option review article, we have explored many complaints against the broker.
Did your forex trading experience with FXNovus become bad after a short profitable spell on small trades? Did you make tax payments on your failed withdrawal request, as the funds did not arrive? Did the customer support team fail to return your hard-earned profits on the FXNovus trading platform? Feel that the South Africa-based forex broker debited illegitimate fees from your trading account? You are not alone! Many traders have voiced these trading concerns while sharing the FXNovus review. In this article, we have highlighted these concerns in greater detail. Read on!
A 39-year-old lecturer in Kuantan has been defrauded of RM493,600 in a sophisticated online investment scam
FXTM
ATFX
XM
FXCM
STARTRADER
CPT Markets
Tribely
Broker Jet
4e
Zonelinesvantop Group Limited
Ons Forex
Desjardins
KENKE CAPITAL
Fxtradeindex
Matrix Banco
Medco Finance Limited