Abstract:Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!

Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with the Kenya-based forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!
FXPesa is alleged to have been persuading traders to deposit and trade through the broker. Its officials seem responsive to your deposit and trading calls. The moment the FXPesa withdrawal request is raised, these officials will stop receiving your calls. This is what this trader stated while sharing the FXPesa review.

Traders also accuse the broker of causing losses with high slippage and trade execution errors. While sharing the FXPesa review, the trader alleged that the broker initiated the stop-loss way before the price fell to the preset limit. Due to this, the trader admitted having borne a loss worth 5.6 USD. Here is the full review.

Traders also claim that FXPesa denies fund withdrawals after they earn initial profits, further establishing that the broker is not reliable for forex trading. They even allege that the broker does everything possible to make sure you lose capital. This even includes manipulating the MT5 platform. Here is a trader who shared his frustration over the lack of access to fund withdrawals.

The complaints marked against FXPesa point to a severe glitch in its operations, affecting traders of all types with varied experience levels. The root cause of the scam allegations is the lack of a license for the broker. Trading with unregulated entities, such as FXPesa, can always lead to capital losses for the trader. As a result, the WikiFX team gave the broker a score of 1.57 out of 10.
To be updated about the latest forex news, keep following us on any of these special chat groups (OIFSYYXKC3, 403M82PDMX or W2LRJZXB7G). Join the group/s by following the instructions shown below.


Foreign exchange trading is basically of two types: Direct Market Access (DMA) and Over the Counter (OTC). Both come with their own pros and cons. It’s important to understand these two concepts before figuring out the differences between them. In this article, we will explain all of these.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

Orbex, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, has recorded 30 exposure complaints on WikiFX, a leading forex broker regulation inquiry tool, so far. Other review websites have also recorded a healthy number of complaints against the brokerage firm. These complaints largely talk about the alleged profit confiscations by the broker in the name of trading violations, difficulty in accessing fund withdrawals, capital losses due to artificial slippage, etc. In this Orbex review, we have investigated user complaints and provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.