Abstract:Do you find mBank services too slow or unresponsive? Do you find your account getting blocked? Failing to access your account online due to several systemic glitches? Can’t perform the transactions on the mBank app? Do you also witness inappropriate stop-level trade execution by the financial services provider? You are not alone! Frustrated by these unfortunate circumstances, many of its clients have shared negative mBank reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of the reviews. Read on!

Do you find mBank services too slow or unresponsive? Do you find your account getting blocked? Failing to access your account online due to several systemic glitches? Cant perform the transactions on the mBank app? Do you also witness inappropriate stop-level trade execution by the financial services provider? You are not alone! Frustrated by these unfortunate circumstances, many of its clients have shared negative mBank reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of the reviews. Read on!
An mBank client recently reported that he lost access to his account and tried to unlock it online. However, the client could not do it successfully. The client further added that mBank issued him a card a year later and kept charging for four years despite it remained inactive during the period. Expressing disappointment over how the bank changed from good to bad, the client said these while sharing the mBank review online.

The client imposed severe allegations on mBank by saying that the latter hid vital information. As per his admission, the client wanted to close his Slovakian account. However, mBank constantly rejected the request. Whats worse is that the bank debited daily fees as the account did not receive the required monthly income of €70. The client conceded that this was never disclosed to him. Check the screenshot below to know the entire matter.

An mBank client recently reported having lost online account access. Although, as per her admission, the mobile app works. However, the client cannot perform transactions through the app. The client tried to resolve the issue by even visiting the bank with his ID, computer and phone. The bank did offer him two activation letters. However, despite these, the client could not regain online bank account access. This made the client share this mBank review.

A forex complaint was also raised, with the trader accusing mBank of closing the trade well before the stop-loss level. This caused losses for the trader. As a result, the trader shared this mBank review.

The WikiFX team took notice of the complaints against mBank and found that it is unlicensed. This sounds alarming for anyone wishing to open accounts with this bank. In view of the elevated risks, the team gave mBank a score of 2.32 out of 10.
For the latest information about the forex landscape, join any of these special chat groups (OIFSYYXKC3, 403M82PDMX or W2LRJZXB7G) by following the instructions shown below.


For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici

For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.

Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!

A disturbing pattern has emerged regarding the broker Trive. Despite holding a high WikiFX score (7.91) and valid licenses in South Africa and Australia, recent investor reports suggest a significant disconnect between the platform's reputation and its treatment of profitable clients. While the regulatory paperwork appears in order, our data indicates that traders are facing sudden account freezes and accusations of "trading abuse" precisely when they attempt to withdraw profits. This report investigates why a seemingly "safe" broker is generating high-risk complaints.