Abstract:Equity markets have come under heavy pressure as sentiment remains broadly pessimistic despite major indices still trading at elevated levels. A series of persistent macro “noise” — including rising g
Equity markets have come under heavy pressure as sentiment remains broadly pessimistic despite major indices still trading at elevated levels. A series of persistent macro “noise” — including rising geopolitical tensions between China and Japan, concerns over power shortages that could slow AI adoption, and elevated equity market valuations — has created a notably cautious investment environment.
On the sentiment side, the markets contrarian indicator flashed an extreme reading. The CNN Fear & Greed Index fell into single digits intraday alongside the U.S. market sell-off, closing at 11, signaling extreme fear.

(Chart 1. CNN Fear & Greed Index; Source: CNN)AI Constraints Are Cooling Valuation Excess — Not Reversing the Trend
In our view, the market has now broadly acknowledged that AI development will be constrained by power shortages, slowing the pace of expansion. This implies that AI-related tech companies may face natural limitations on further P/E expansion. In other words, the market is self-correcting through valuation deflation rather than shifting the long-term structural trend.
Crypto Suffers a “Bloodbath” as Capital Rotates Into AI
The broader financial market has seen a sharp sell-off, particularly within the cryptocurrency sector, which is being crowded out by mainstream AI-related investment narratives. Bitcoin briefly broke below $90,000, turning its year-to-date performance negative. From the peak, BTC has dropped more than 30%, while the Nasdaq 100 is up 17% over the same period.
Outflows confirm the risk-off tone:
Over the past 7 days, $2.843 billion left Bitcoin spot markets, while 30-day net outflows totaled $4.64 billion. This “crypto capitulation” has pushed funding costs higher and accelerated market-wide deleveraging — a natural balancing mechanism.

(Chart 2. Bitcoin Spot Net Outflow; Source: coinglass.com)Liquidity Tightening: Dollar Funding Turns Stressful
Dollar liquidity indicators are signaling growing stress.
The SOFR overnight rate stands at 4.00%, now above the Feds IORB upper bound of 3.90%, indicating tightened USD funding conditions. Despite banks still maintaining relatively ample reserves, the impact on tech stocks is indirect, mainly through increased volatility — the same applies to assets such as gold.
Liquidity stress does not immediately imply a market crash, but it does compress future beta potential. Based on our analysis, bank reserve balances falling below $2.5 trillion would mark a danger zone; current levels remain roughly $300 billion above that threshold.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasurys cash balance sits at an elevated $920 billion, continuing to drain liquidity from the system. However, with the Treasury likely to reduce issuance should balances fall below the $850 billion benchmark in December, overall market conditions still appear resilient, with low probability of systemic failure.
That said, tightening liquidity does not support gold prices. Investors should remain cautious about golds vulnerability to liquidity-driven downside swings.
Gold Technical Analysis

Gold extended its downward move, fully in line with yesterdays trend. Price action continues to show a pattern of lower highs and lower lows, reflecting a sustained bearish structure. The strategy remains to sell into strength, with expectations of an ongoing medium-term downtrend.
Using Fibonacci projection tools, the next short-term downside target is near 3,900.
From the small Fibonacci extension, gold has tested the 4,072 resistance level. Failure to break this zone would likely trigger further intraday downside. Avoid adopting a bullish bias prematurely; a $30 stop-loss is recommended for risk control.
Support: 3,900
Resistance: 4,032 / 4,113
Risk Disclaimer: The views, analyses, research, prices, and data provided are for general market commentary only and do not represent the platforms stance. All readers should evaluate risks independently and operate with caution.