Abstract:D Prime, the brokerage arm of Doo Group, is closing its Limassol office after layoffs, as the firm realigns operations and faces regulatory scrutiny.

D Prime, the retail and institutional brokerage arm of Doo Group, is preparing to vacate one of its two Limassol offices following a wave of staff reductions. Employees were reportedly informed that the premises would be closed within two weeks.
The company confirmed the move, stating that the decision is part of a broader restructuring effort. “Doo Group is realigning its operational structure,” a spokesperson told the outlet, underscoring that the changes are linked to its global growth strategy.
The closure follows the dismissal of the brokers Cyprus-based marketing department last month, with additional layoffs now extending to other teams.
The restructuring comes less than a year after Doo Group secured a Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) license, which was granted in September and publicly announced in November. The license allows the broker to provide derivative products, including contracts for difference (CFDs), across the European market.

D Prime itself was only recently rebranded from Doo Prime, signaling the groups intent to strengthen its European presence. Despite the office closure, the company maintains multiple regulatory approvals worldwide, including in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
In its statement, Doo Group emphasized that the realignment is designed to “enhance efficiency and concentrate resources within key strategic regions,” while expressing gratitude to employees affected by the transition.
Separately, Doo Group confirmed that its Malaysian office was recently inspected by local authorities. The visit formed part of a nationwide campaign targeting illegal call centres and unlicensed operations.
The broker stressed that its activities remain fully compliant and that it is cooperating with regulators by providing all requested documentation. The firm highlighted that governance and accountability remain central to its business model, noting that its internal standards are designed to address regulatory matters swiftly.
Doo Group is a global financial services provider offering multi-asset trading solutions to retail and institutional clients. The company operates under multiple licenses across key financial jurisdictions, with a focus on compliance, technology, and client service.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.
The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.