Abstract:Two UK traders fined £280K in FCA insider trading case, highlighting tougher market abuse regulation and surveillance compliance demands.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured fines totalling £280,000 and suspended prison sentences against two self-employed day traders for insider dealing, in a case underscoring the regulators uncompromising stance on market integrity enforcement.
Matthew and Nikolas West, acting outside any regulated firm, were found guilty of exploiting confidential broker information between 2016 and 2020. The FCA confirmed that the misconduct breached UK Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and demonstrated that no participant in the capital markets is beyond regulatory scrutiny in trading.
Matthew West, a veteran trader with over two decades of experience, was approached under legitimate “wall crossing” arrangements to consider investments in upcoming capital raises—often involving Alternative Investment Market-listed companies. These arrangements required strict confidentiality.

Instead, Matthew passed the price-sensitive details to his brother Nikolas. The pair coordinated trades ahead of public announcements, generating over £44,000 in gains. However, under UK trading regulations, penalties were calculated on the total value of all trades executed with inside information, not just profits.
The court ordered:
Both must also contribute over £50,000 towards prosecution costs and pay the confiscation order within 14 days or face further custodial sentences.
The FCA stressed that this was not institutional misconduct but an opportunistic case of capital markets misconduct. The regulator warned that surveillance systems for compliance must adapt to detect suspicious trading activity monitoring across all communication channels, including encrypted messaging and voice notes.
Firms are expected to:
Under Financial Conduct Authority insider dealing rules and Market abuse regulation UK, firms must maintain insider lists, control access to sensitive data, and ensure timely public disclosures. FCA Handbook SYSC 10A mandates recording and monitoring of relevant communications, while Market Watch 79 highlights recurring failings in alert calibration and off-channel communication oversight.
The FCA‘s enforcement actions in this and other insider dealing cases reaffirm that market integrity enforcement is not just about having policies—it’s about ensuring they work in practice.


Does your deposit amount fail to reflect in your Exnova forex trading account? Does the same thing happen even when withdrawing? Does the Exnova bonus lure lead to a NIL account balance? Has the broker terminated your account without any explanation? These trading issues have become synonymous with traders here. Some traders have openly criticized the broker on several review platforms online. In this Exnova review article, we have highlighted the miserable forex trading experiences.

Has your FortuixAgent app for forex trading been restricted? Does the broker not allow you to withdraw your initial deposits? Does the UK-based forex broker demand payment out of your earnings to allow withdrawals? These issues refuse to leave traders, as they come out expressing their frustration on broker review platforms. In this Fortuixagent review article, we have shared many complaints made against the broker.

The FCA warns of a "clone" broker impersonating Fortrade. Discover how to spot the scam and protect your funds with WikiFX.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has brought nine criminal charges against Mr. Henrik Schliemann, a former director of an FCA-regulated merchant bank, accusing him of multiple counts of fraud, forgery, and financial misconduct.