Abstract:The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has raised the alarm over a surge in impersonation scams, with close to 500 people losing money in the first half of 2025.

Between January and June, the FCA recorded 4,465 reports of fraudsters misusing its name to deceive consumers. Out of these, 480 victims transferred funds directly to criminals. Older investors appear to be the primary targets, with those aged over 56 accounting for nearly two-thirds of the reports.
The scams often arrive via phone calls, emails, text messages, or WhatsApp, with fraudsters claiming to represent the FCA. They then request payments or sensitive banking details under the pretense of recovering lost investments.
The most common approach involves convincing victims that the FCA has retrieved cryptocurrency allegedly linked to their identities. To access these funds, victims are asked to provide bank information or make additional transfers.
Other schemes involve contacting people who already lost money in fraudulent loans, offering “recovery assistance” for a fee, or sending fake legal notices claiming consumers owe money and must pay the FCA directly.
A particularly harmful trend is so-called “pig butchering” scams, where fraudsters build personal or romantic connections before luring victims into fraudulent investments. After the initial loss, the same criminals return posing as FCA officials offering to help recover funds—again, in exchange for money.
The regulator noted that in 2024 it received 10,379 impersonation scam reports, with 991 victims losing funds. If the current pace continues, 2025 could see another year of sharp increases in financial harm caused by impersonators.
The FCA has made it clear that it will never request money transfers or ask for sensitive banking information such as PINs and passwords. Any message or call making such claims should raise immediate suspicion.
To stay protected, investors are advised to verify the legitimacy of financial service providers through official channels. One effective way is to use platforms like WikiFX, which allow users to check whether a broker is properly licensed and supervised. This extra step of verification can help prevent falling victim to scams that misuse the names of regulators or established institutions.
By combining caution, direct checks with regulators, and tools like WikiFXs broker search, investors can significantly reduce their exposure to fraudsters who exploit trust to steal funds.

Does your deposit amount fail to reflect in your Exnova forex trading account? Does the same thing happen even when withdrawing? Does the Exnova bonus lure lead to a NIL account balance? Has the broker terminated your account without any explanation? These trading issues have become synonymous with traders here. Some traders have openly criticized the broker on several review platforms online. In this Exnova review article, we have highlighted the miserable forex trading experiences.

Has your FortuixAgent app for forex trading been restricted? Does the broker not allow you to withdraw your initial deposits? Does the UK-based forex broker demand payment out of your earnings to allow withdrawals? These issues refuse to leave traders, as they come out expressing their frustration on broker review platforms. In this Fortuixagent review article, we have shared many complaints made against the broker.

The FCA warns of a "clone" broker impersonating Fortrade. Discover how to spot the scam and protect your funds with WikiFX.

A disturbing pattern has emerged from recent trader reports regarding Admirals (also known as Admiral Markets). While the broker holds valid licenses in some jurisdictions, a flood of recent complaints suggests a disconnect between their regulatory status and their treatment of client profits. Our investigation uncovers a "two-tier" reality: valid regulation on paper, but alleged profit withholding, opaque fee demands, and sudden leverage changes in practice.