Abstract:Malaysian police inspect Doo Group’s Kuala Lumpur call center amid nationwide crackdown on financial scams. Operations remain unaffected.

Doo Group Call Center Inspected Amid Fraud Probe
Malaysian authorities recently conducted an inspection of the Doo Group Malaysia call center in Kuala Lumpur, as part of a sweeping crackdown on financial scams across the country. The facility, operated by the Retail FX and CFDs brokerage Doo Group, was among several business premises visited during the enforcement campaign.
The raid occurred earlier this week in Bangsar South, a commercial hub in Kuala Lumpur, where hundreds of individuals were reportedly detained. According to China Press and other local outlets, at least seven police trucks transported detainees for further investigation. However, it remains unclear whether any Doo Group employees or contractors were among those arrested.
Malaysias Home Affairs Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail confirmed that over 11,800 individuals have been arrested this year in connection with nearly 32,000 fraud cases, totaling losses of RM1.5 billion (approximately USD 355 million).

Doo Group Responds: Operations Unaffected
In a statement issued following the inspection, a Doo Group spokesperson emphasized that the companys Kuala Lumpur call center operations remain fully functional and compliant. The center primarily services clients in China and the broader Far East region under D Prime, the offshore CFDs broker recently rebranded from Doo Prime.
“As part of a broader nationwide campaign against illegal call centres, Malaysian authorities recently conducted inspections at several business premises, including ours,” the spokesperson stated. “We are working transparently and constructively with the authorities by providing all the information required.”
The company reaffirmed its commitment to compliance and governance standards, citing integrity and accountability as core operational values.
D Prime and Doo Groups Global Footprint
D Prime, domiciled in Mauritius and Vanuatu, serves as Doo Groups offshore arm targeting traders across the APAC and MENA regions. The broader Doo Group also operates licensed entities in the UK and EU, including FCA-regulated Doo Clearing Limited and CySEC-licensed Doo Financial Cyprus Limited.
Controlled by Chinese national Junjie Chen, the group maintains a dual presence through both offshore and onshore operations. While scrutiny continues around financial scams in Malaysia, Doo Groups legal standing and regulatory compliance remain intact.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.
The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.