Abstract:Despite multiple licenses, Admiral Markets presents potential red flags that traders should not ignore, including a suspicious clone alert and disclosure by Malaysia’s Securities Commission.

Despite multiple licenses, Admiral Markets presents potential red flags that traders should not ignore, including a suspicious clone alert and disclosure by Malaysias Securities Commission.
Admiral Markets operates under several financial licenses around the world. It is regulated by the United Kingdoms Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under license number 595450, one of the most reputable regulators in the industry.

It is also licensed by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under license 201/13, and the Seychelles Financial Services Authority with license SD073. These licenses show that Admiral Markets is officially registered in several major jurisdictions.


However, not all of the regulatory listings are without issue.
One serious concern is Admiral Markets license under the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), listed as S000410681. This license has been flagged as a “suspicious clone”, meaning it may be falsely using or mimicking another firm's license details. Traders should be cautious when encountering such warnings, as cloned entities can appear legitimate but operate without proper oversight.

In addition, the Securities Commission Malaysia has officially disclosed Admiral Markets, which generally serves as a public warning. While not a direct accusation, this type of disclosure often reflects concerns about unlicensed activity or breaches of local regulatory rules.

Although Admiral Markets holds valid licenses in several regions, the presence of a suspicious clone license and regulatory disclosure from Malaysia suggests that traders need to approach with care. Even well-known brokers can have parts of their operations that do not meet global regulatory standards.
It is important to always verify which entity of a broker you are dealing with, especially when brokers operate through multiple regional subsidiaries or have overlapping websites and names. The existence of a suspicious license can make this harder and may mislead less experienced traders.

Conducting due diligence before investing is crucial, and independent verification tools such as WikiFX can be instrumental in assessing the legitimacy of brokers and investment firms. The WikiFX mobile application, available on Google Play and the App Store, provides comprehensive insights into brokers regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings. By leveraging such resources, investors can make informed decisions and avoid the financial devastation caused by fraudulent schemes.


It starts with a phone call—often aggressive, always persistent. A "personal manager" promises to guide you through the complexities of the market, asking for a modest $200 deposit. But according to sixteen separate reports from victims across Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East, that initial deposit is just the entry fee to a financial hostage situation.

If you are thinking about trading with dbinvesting, you need to be very careful. At WikiFX, we analyze brokers based on facts, licenses, and trader feedback.

BitPania is a relatively new brokerage established in 2024 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform markets itself as a digital trading solution offering multiple account types and support for automated trading (EAs). However, potential investors should approach with significant caution. Currently, BitPania holds a WikiFX Score of 1.20, a very low rating that reflects its lack of regulatory oversight and recent user complaints regarding withdrawals.

ExpertOption presents itself as a sleek, modern trading platform with a low barrier to entry, attracting significant attention across social media and search engines. With its proprietary app and promises of easy profits, it’s no surprise many beginners are tempted to sign up. However, flashy interface design often hides fundamental risks.