Abstract:Xtreme Markets, a forex and CFD broker, operates under a licence issued by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius. While this regulatory stamp may appear reassuring at first glance, a closer look at the nature of offshore licences reveals several critical factors that investors should not ignore.

Xtreme Markets, a forex and CFD broker, operates under a licence issued by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius. The company holds a Retail Forex Licence with registration number GB22200951. While this regulatory stamp may appear reassuring at first glance, a closer look at the nature of offshore licences reveals several critical factors that investors should not ignore.


The FSC of Mauritius is categorised as an offshore regulator. Offshore jurisdictions typically offer lower entry barriers for brokers, including less stringent capital requirements, minimal ongoing supervision, and limited mechanisms for investor redress in cases of misconduct. This regulatory leniency is often used by firms seeking operational freedom while still presenting a façade of legitimacy to unsuspecting clients.
Although Xtreme Markets is technically regulated, the offshore nature of its licence introduces a significant level of underlying risk. Offshore regulators are not generally known for active enforcement or tight oversight, which means that client protection may be minimal. In the event of a dispute or broker insolvency, recovering funds can become a lengthy and uncertain process.
Onshore vs Offshore Forex Broker Licences: Why the Difference Matters
Understanding the difference between onshore and offshore regulation is essential for any trader evaluating a broker. Onshore regulators, such as the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the United States, are known for strict standards. These include segregation of client funds, compensation schemes, transparent fee disclosures, and strong compliance checks.
In contrast, offshore regulators typically lack the infrastructure and legal frameworks necessary to provide comparable investor protection. This gap is often exploited by brokers that wish to operate internationally while avoiding the costs and compliance burdens associated with reputable onshore jurisdictions. In many cases, brokers registered offshore may still actively solicit clients in regulated countries without being authorised to do so, raising serious concerns about transparency and legal standing.
This is not to say that every offshore-licensed broker operates unethically, but the lack of robust oversight significantly increases the risk for investors. Without comprehensive regulation, the brokers internal practices, such as how client funds are handled or how trades are executed, remain largely unverified by a credible third party.
While Xtreme Markets may present itself as a regulated broker, its status as an offshore-licensed entity under the Mauritius FSC highlights important limitations in terms of regulatory assurance and investor protection. Traders considering such brokers should exercise heightened caution and ensure they fully understand the nature of the regulatory environment in which the broker operates.


CFTC Polymarket approval clears path for Polymarket U.S. relaunch 2025, reshaping regulated prediction markets in the United States.

For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.

For any experienced trader, the long-term viability of a brokerage partner hinges on a delicate balance of trust, execution quality, and, critically, cost. Trading fees, both direct and indirect, can significantly erode profitability over time. This makes a granular understanding of a broker's cost structure not just beneficial, but essential. This in-depth analysis focuses on MH Markets, breaking down its commission fees, spreads, and other associated costs to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker for their long-term strategies. Drawing primarily on verified data from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, alongside other public information, we will dissect the MH Markets spreads commissions cost structure. We aim to move beyond marketing claims and uncover the practical, real-world costs of trading with this broker, helping you determine if its pricing model aligns with your trading style and financial goals.

So, we will begin this Tio Markets review with the key topic—its regulation and the authorities it is licensed under. After that, we will walk you through the real user complaints we found during our research.