Abstract:Rakuten Securities Inc., one of Japan’s leading online brokerage firms, has ramped up its identity verification measures after falling victim to a wave of fraudulent transactions.

Rakuten Securities Inc., one of Japans leading online brokerage firms, has ramped up its identity verification measures after falling victim to a wave of fraudulent transactions. The incidents, which surfaced in March, were linked to phishing attacks that tricked customers into revealing sensitive login credentials.
The fraudulent activity involved the unauthorised sale of customers‘ stocks and investment trust funds. The proceeds were then used to purchase low-volume stocks in Chinese companies without the account holders’ consent. Rakuten Securities confirmed the transactions had not resulted from an internal data breach, suggesting that customer information remained secure on its servers. However, the company declined to disclose the number or extent of affected transactions, citing concerns over potential repeat offences.
Investigations indicate that phishing emails, mimicking official communication from Rakuten Securities, were at the heart of the scam. These emails urged recipients to confirm their account information for security purposes. Victims who clicked on the provided links were redirected to counterfeit websites designed to steal login details. Once compromised, their accounts were hijacked and manipulated.

The attackers typically sold off the victims existing assets and used the funds to buy Chinese stocks. While the motive behind choosing such stocks remains unclear, company officials suspect that the perpetrators are part of a larger scheme to artificially inflate prices and offload their holdings at a profit.
In response, Rakuten Securities introduced a new security feature on 23 March known as “risk-based authentication.” This mechanism prompts users to provide additional identity verification if they access their accounts using unfamiliar devices. Customers must also call a specific toll-free number from a phone registered with the firm to complete transactions. No prior arrangement is required for this verification process. The firm has also encouraged users to update their PINs as an added precaution.
SBI Securities Co., another prominent Japanese brokerage, has reported similar incidents, although on a significantly smaller scale. Like Rakuten, its customers were targeted by deceptive emails claiming their accounts had been temporarily suspended due to suspicious activity. The emails instructed users to re-enter their credentials to restore access, leading many to unwittingly disclose their private information.
SBI Securities has since decided to strengthen its security infrastructure. Previously, customers only had to undergo two-factor authentication when withdrawing over 500,000 yen (approximately $3,320). From 9 May onwards, this security measure will apply to all withdrawals, regardless of the amount.
Both firms are urging clients to remain vigilant, avoid clicking on unsolicited links, and refrain from entering personal data on suspicious websites. These events underscore a growing threat to online investors, with phishing scams becoming increasingly sophisticated and difficult to detect. As financial institutions bolster their defences, customer awareness remains the first line of protection against these digital threats.


AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.

This Valbury review examines PT Valbury Asia Futures, Broker Code 3441997314, its Bappebti record, the Q1 2026 A+++ assessment, product-specific costs, segregated accounts, withdrawals and complaint routes for traders researching an Indonesia forex broker.

A Prime of Prime forex arrangement can help a broker access trading relationships, credit intermediation, technology connectivity, and liquidity aggregation that may otherwise be difficult to obtain directly. But the label does not prove direct bank access, executable depth, or a particular execution outcome. This 2026 guide explains what a forex Prime of Prime, PoP liquidity provider, prime brokerage forex service, and forex prime broker proposal can mean in practice; where the credit and order-routing chain must be documented; how to test pricing, limits, rejects, records, and resilience; and which commercial terms create hidden operating cost. Use the comparison framework, red-flag list, and 90-day launch plan to assess fit for your client mix and risk model. The objective is a controllable execution dependency with traceable evidence, not a marketing claim about institutional access.

FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.