Abstract:Recent discussions in online communities have raised serious questions about IQCent—a platform that has come under fire for its alleged withdrawal issues and questionable reliability. According to WikiFX, IQCent has received an alarmingly low trust score of 1.49/10, prompting many investors to rethink their involvement with this platform.
Recent discussions in online communities have raised serious questions about IQCent—a platform that has come under fire for its alleged withdrawal issues and questionable reliability. According to WikiFX, IQCent has received an alarmingly low trust score of 1.49/10, prompting many investors to rethink their involvement with this platform.
One of the most pressing concerns among users is the reported inability to withdraw funds from their IQCent accounts. Multiple accounts on social media have aired similar grievances, with investors warning others about the difficulty—or outright impossibility—of retrieving their investments. The inability to withdraw not only erodes trust but also raises suspicions regarding the overall legitimacy of the platform.
A key piece of evidence against IQCent comes from WikiFX. IQCents score of 1.49 out of 10 is a stark indicator of underlying issues, such as:
Across various social media channels, active members of the trading community have voiced strong warnings regarding IQCent and similar platforms. The call to avoid further deposits if withdrawals are hindered is becoming a common refrain. These warnings are a reminder that:
If youve experienced difficulty withdrawing funds from IQCent or related platforms like Bacoins or Cowcoin, consider this a critical warning sign. It is essential not only to rely on high returns as a promise but also to scrutinize the fundamental trustworthiness of the service provider. Here are some steps you can take:
The issues surrounding IQCent highlight a broader challenge in todays financial markets—ensuring that high returns do not come at the cost of liquidity and transparency. The combination of withdrawal problems, alarmingly low trust ratings from WikiFX, and vocal community warnings indicates that caution is warranted. Investors must undertake extensive research and trust their gut when something seems amiss. Your financial security is too important to risk on platforms that fail to live up to their promises.
FINEX review 2025: BAPPEBTI-regulated broker in Indonesia with JFX membership, MT4 access, low deposits, and secure funds via KBI. Pros, cons, and verdict.
TenX Prime currently has been accused by dozens of trader complaints, claiming its PAMM system went offline in early October 2025, leaving investors unable to access funds or withdraw. Multiple complaints point out two PAMM managers — “Chris Anderson” and “Paul Gold Hunter” who promoted investment pools and directed followers into TenX Prime.
Recently, WikiFX received multiple reports from traders who used to trade with TenX Prime, claiming this broker has defrauded them. According to these traders, the PAMM (Percent Allocation Management Module) system of TenX Prime has completely stopped responding since October, leading to significant financial losses among investors.
FBS launches an AI Assistant powered by OpenAI technology to help traders analyze charts, detect trends, and make data-driven trading decisions faster and more confidently.