Abstract:A $5 million fine and executive suspension spotlight systemic risk management failures—how did a licensed firm bypass safeguards for over two years?

Hong Kong‘s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has fined Enlighten Securities Limited (ESL) HK$5 million and suspended a senior executive’s license for seven months, following an investigation into lapses in its securities margin financing practices between 2020 and 2022. The penalties highlight persistent weaknesses in the firms risk controls, raising questions about how regulatory guidelines were systematically ignored.
The SFC found that ESL allowed high-risk clients with chronic margin shortfalls and poor repayment histories to continue trading without restrictions. Despite clear regulatory requirements, the firm failed to enforce basic safeguards—such as blocking further securities purchases for undercapitalized accounts or initiating forced liquidations. In some cases, margin calls were delayed for months, while explanations for policy deviations went undocumented.
The investigation uncovered four critical failures that persisted for over two years:
Clients with insufficient equity faced no trading blocks, enabling unchecked securities purchases despite mounting risks.
The firm avoided forced liquidations even as clients repeatedly missed payments, opting for informal negotiations over documented procedures.
Credit ceilings remained unchanged regardless of clients deteriorating financial health or market volatility.
Margin payments were allowed to languish for weeks, with no systematic follow-up to recover overdue amounts.
These practices directly contravened the SFCs Internal Control Guidelines and Code of Conduct, exposing both the firm and its clients to significant financial risks.
Mr. Denny Kua Kong Chak, a senior manager overseeing ESL‘s operations during the relevant period, received a seven-month license suspension for failing to implement adequate controls. The SFC noted that while ESL’s decision to cease operations and its previously clean disciplinary record were mitigating factors, the penalties aimed to “send a clear deterrent message to the market.”
The SFC reiterated that licensed firms must adopt real-time monitoring systems, enforce strict liquidation protocols, and maintain auditable records of all policy exceptions.

Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Deriv exposed via client cases of withdrawal issues, 13‑month refund delays, severe slippage, and disabled accounts despite multiple “regulated” licenses.

For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.