Abstract:The demand for federal employees to share work accomplishments or be forced to resign sparked alarm and led to much confusion.
A group of unions and advocacy groups filed an updated lawsuit against Elon Musk after federal employees received an email that instructed them to explain their work accomplishments or face being fired.
The suit alleges that the email violates laws governing the federal workforce, and it argues that the agency overseeing workers - the Office of Personnel Management - does not have the authority for the demand.
OPM sent employees an email with the subject: What did you do last week? It instructed them to provide a list of five achievements, without revealing classified information.
However, several agency leaders - including Trump appointees - have pushed back by telling staff not to respond.
But Musk maintained on X that he was acting on instructions from President Donald Trump and that a failure to reply to the email by Monday night will be taken as a resignation.
This meant that, like many of Musks directives, the demand for federal employees to justify their work sparked confusion, anger, and alarm among federal government employees. The differing responses from agency leaders only created greater uncertainty.
Over the weekend, thousands of public health workers at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) received a series of conflicting directives regarding the email.
They first received guidance that the instruction was legitimate, and they were told to read and respond to it by Monday, according to an email seen by the BBC.
HHS employees then received an update, directing them to pause activities related to the email. HHS officials were working with the administration‘s personnel office to comply while being mindful of the agency’s sensitive activities, the new guidance said.
Theyre succeeding in driving us insane, said one employee who works under HHS, and asked not to be named for fear of retaliation.
Staff was still waiting for agency leadership to meet and decide next steps as of Monday, the employee said.
Some federal employees said they had contemplated small acts of rebellion, like responding to the email with recent tasks such as answering hate mail and firing their colleagues.
The US Department of Justice, Department of Defense, and Federal Bureau of Investigation have all recommended their staff not respond to the email, which had a Monday night deadline. All are currently run by Trump appointees and loyalists.
In a statement posted to X, Department of Defense official Darin Selnick told staff to please pause any response to the email.
The Department of Defense is responsible for reviewing the performance of its personnel and it will conduct any review in accordance with its own procedures, the statement said.
Kash Patel, Donald Trump‘s new head of the FBI who has railed against federal employees, also issued a similar direction to the agency’s staff, but the Department of Transportation directed its employees to follow the emails instructions.
The new lawsuit responding to the email is attached to one filed last week in California, which seeks to block the Trump administrations mass firing of federal workers.
The revised version alleges that no OPM rule, regulation, policy, or program has ever, in United States history, purported to require all federal workers to submit reports to OPM.
Major federal employee unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees, as well as advocacy groups like Vote Vets are part of the lawsuit. A group called the State Democracy Defenders Fund and the California-based Altshuler Berzon law firm represent them.
Musks latest tactic to cull federal employees has raised concerns it could reveal classified information or violate government procedures.
Federal employees have a duty to ensure that sensitive information, data, and records are only used and disclosed for authorized purposes, American Federation of Government Employees president Everett Kelley wrote to OPM leadership.
Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency have taken aggressive action to cut down the federal workforce. They have bombarded government employees with emails sent via through OPM, threatening layoffs, offering buyouts with questionable terms, dismissing probationary employees, and ordering managers to make lists of employees to cut.
The efforts have sparked anger from within the federal workforce and a barrage of lawsuits, but this latest order has publicly countered from within agency leadership itself.
Max Stier, president of the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, called the email yet another example of the new administrations contempt for public servants and public service that will lead to further confusion, anxiety and waste.
Trumps allies have praised the idea of forcing government employees to justify their work.
I think its a great idea, you do it in private business all the time, Rep Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee, told News Nation. You have to have accountability.