Abstract:A 56-year-old trader from Gombak, Malaysia, recently lost more than RM1.6 million in a sophisticated online investment scam orchestrated through the popular messaging application, WeChat.

A 56-year-old trader from Gombak, Malaysia, recently lost more than RM1.6 million in a sophisticated online investment scam orchestrated through the popular messaging application, WeChat. Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan confirmed the case, which involved a fraudulent investment app that exploited the victim's trust and led to substantial financial losses.
The investigation revealed that the trader was first approached by the suspect via WeChat, where they convinced him to download an investment app linked to a supposed online trading platform. The trader was then encouraged to deposit funds into this platform. Shortly after transferring the funds, the app showed that his investment was generating profits. This initial success appeared promising, strengthening the victim's trust in the platform and motivating further engagement.
However, complications began when the trader attempted to withdraw his alleged profits. The app cited various administrative fees and taxes as obstacles to the withdrawal. Among the reasons provided were so-called “cross-border transfer fees” and additional tax requirements, which the suspect claimed were necessary for the withdrawal process. According to the police report, these excuses compelled the victim to make further payments in an attempt to retrieve his funds.

Over time, the trader made a total of 44 transactions, transferring RM1,688,725 across four separate accounts associated with the fraudulent platform. Only after his continued efforts to withdraw funds remained unsuccessful did he realise that the promised profits were a sham. The trader then filed a report with the Selangor Police on November 9, prompting an official investigation into the case.
In response to the incident, Selangor's Commercial Crime Investigation Department opened an investigation under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which addresses cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property. This case has sparked concerns among the authorities, leading them to urge the public to exercise caution when engaging in online investment schemes.
The police chief highlighted the importance of verifying the legitimacy of investment platforms before transferring funds, advising individuals to consult Malaysias central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia, and the Securities Commission Malaysia to authenticate the credentials of stock investments. He emphasised that scams exploiting digital platforms have become increasingly sophisticated, making it essential for investors to conduct thorough checks before committing to any investment apps.

To prevent falling victim to fraudulent schemes like this one, using tools like WikiFX can be a game-changer. WikiFX provides detailed information on brokers, including regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings, allowing users to verify the legitimacy of any investment platform before committing their money. With access to in-depth insights and risk alerts, WikiFX equips potential investors with the resources to make informed decisions and avoid unauthorised or unlicensed entities. By checking with WikiFX, users can confidently protect their savings and avoid the costly traps set by unscrupulous investment syndicates.


Malaysian authorities have carried out a sudden, large-scale crackdown in Kuala Lumpur, detaining hundreds of undocumented foreigners and suspected online scam workers. The operation signals a tougher enforcement stance, with frontline operators targeted amid a broader regional push against scam networks.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact