Abstract:A 56-year-old trader from Gombak, Malaysia, recently lost more than RM1.6 million in a sophisticated online investment scam orchestrated through the popular messaging application, WeChat.

A 56-year-old trader from Gombak, Malaysia, recently lost more than RM1.6 million in a sophisticated online investment scam orchestrated through the popular messaging application, WeChat. Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan confirmed the case, which involved a fraudulent investment app that exploited the victim's trust and led to substantial financial losses.
The investigation revealed that the trader was first approached by the suspect via WeChat, where they convinced him to download an investment app linked to a supposed online trading platform. The trader was then encouraged to deposit funds into this platform. Shortly after transferring the funds, the app showed that his investment was generating profits. This initial success appeared promising, strengthening the victim's trust in the platform and motivating further engagement.
However, complications began when the trader attempted to withdraw his alleged profits. The app cited various administrative fees and taxes as obstacles to the withdrawal. Among the reasons provided were so-called “cross-border transfer fees” and additional tax requirements, which the suspect claimed were necessary for the withdrawal process. According to the police report, these excuses compelled the victim to make further payments in an attempt to retrieve his funds.

Over time, the trader made a total of 44 transactions, transferring RM1,688,725 across four separate accounts associated with the fraudulent platform. Only after his continued efforts to withdraw funds remained unsuccessful did he realise that the promised profits were a sham. The trader then filed a report with the Selangor Police on November 9, prompting an official investigation into the case.
In response to the incident, Selangor's Commercial Crime Investigation Department opened an investigation under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which addresses cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property. This case has sparked concerns among the authorities, leading them to urge the public to exercise caution when engaging in online investment schemes.
The police chief highlighted the importance of verifying the legitimacy of investment platforms before transferring funds, advising individuals to consult Malaysias central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia, and the Securities Commission Malaysia to authenticate the credentials of stock investments. He emphasised that scams exploiting digital platforms have become increasingly sophisticated, making it essential for investors to conduct thorough checks before committing to any investment apps.

To prevent falling victim to fraudulent schemes like this one, using tools like WikiFX can be a game-changer. WikiFX provides detailed information on brokers, including regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings, allowing users to verify the legitimacy of any investment platform before committing their money. With access to in-depth insights and risk alerts, WikiFX equips potential investors with the resources to make informed decisions and avoid unauthorised or unlicensed entities. By checking with WikiFX, users can confidently protect their savings and avoid the costly traps set by unscrupulous investment syndicates.


XTB, a United Kingdom-based forex broker, has drawn significant traction on broker review platforms such as WikIFX. Users keep sharing their unfortunate stories concerning the loss of funds as the broker allegedly denied their withdrawal claims. The latest scam allegation surfaced as early as a day before writing this XTB review article. It shares users’ perspectives of the problems encountered due to this alleged trading activity. But before that, we will go through a summary of its trading products and other details. Let’s investigate the brokerage entity comprehensively with us.

Spot +15 Danrex and similar platforms using multiple domains to hide their illegal activities are becoming a major concern. Read about how regulators like IOSCO are warning investors, and explore WikiFX’s in-depth cases of fraudulent domain-switching practices.

IVISION, a Saint Lucia-based trading firm, mostly receives negative reviews from users. They claim that the broker’s withdrawal process is a scam, a deliberate attempt to defraud investors. At the same time, some traders have complained of an account freeze by the brokerage entity upon withdrawals. We have investigated user complaints in this IVISION review article. Keep reading.

Has your experience worsened with Ubuntu Markets after you requested withdrawals with the South Africa-based forex broker? Despite good trading, did you have to wait for a long time to access funds? Were you handled by several incompetent account managers who only cared for deposits and not your returns? These are no longer just issues; they have been converted into full-fledged complaints against the forex broker. In this Ubuntu Markets review article, we have examined a series of allegations against the brokerage entity.