Abstract:Popular Thai YouTuber Natthamon Khongchak, accused of a S$77M forex scam, is on the run, leaving thousands of investors in turmoil.

Natthamon Khongchak, commonly known as Nutty the YouTuber, is a popular Thai YouTuber who is apparently on the run after being accused of organizing a large forex trading fraud. According to The Nation, she is suspected of defrauding hundreds of investors from a stunning 2 billion baht (S$77 million). This story has sent shockwaves across internet trading, raising significant questions about investment fraud.
Natthamon, who has over 800,000 subscribers on her YouTube channel, Nutty's Diary, portrays herself as a successful FX trader. She drew many investors by leveraging her celebrity and promised them substantial returns in unusually short periods. Her investment plans promised 25 percent returns on three-month contracts, 30 percent on six-month contracts, and 35 percent on twelve-month contracts, with monthly payments.

The lawyer representing the victims said that around 6,000 individuals fell victim to Natthamon's alleged fraud. According to the lawyer, Natthamon used her influencer role to persuade individuals to invest in her scams, generating a sense of trust and trustworthiness. Her claims of rapid and huge rewards enticed many to invest enormous amounts of money.
Trouble started to emerge in April when her investors complained about late payments. Despite the rising complaints, Natthamon insisted that her followers' money was secure. However, the situation worsened rapidly in May when she disclosed to Instagram that she had lost all her money due to a trading blunder. She vowed to reimburse her investment, but legal complications exacerbated her financial problems.
Natthamon announced in June that she was facing two lawsuits, which complicated her ability to repay her investors. She cautioned that if imprisoned, she would be unable to make any payments. This news heightened the worry and dissatisfaction of her investors, many of whom had already lost considerable sums of money.
Natthamon is said to have fled to Malaysia when the crisis escalated. Her abduction has resulted in a trail of troubled investors demanding restitution. One persistent victim has even offered a 1 million baht (S$38,391) reward for information leading to her arrest, illustrating the desperation and anger of those impacted by the fraud.
Thai authorities are under pressure to locate Natthamon and bring her to justice. As the hunt continues, the issue remains a hot subject, with many people avidly waiting for details on her location and the status of legal proceedings against her.


Did your deposit fail to show on the FBS platform? Were you denied fund withdrawals by the Belize-based brokerage firm? Faced an unaccounted fund deduction from your trading account? Did you face losses due to the incorrect triggering of your stop-loss order on the FBS login? These issues have allegedy become widespread among users worldwide, and some of them have reported the same on broker evaluation platforms such as WikiFX. This FBS review 2026 investigates reported issues while providing an overview of the broker's regulatory status.

Panchkula Police have described Rajesh Kumar, a man also known as "Nana", as a key local recruiter in an alleged investment and cryptocurrency fraud spanning Haryana and estimated at Rs 8 crore or more. Four men have been arrested so far, luxury vehicles have been seized, and investigators suspect some alleged operators are based in Dubai, according to a News18 report that attributes its police account to The Indian Express.

Indian stocks have fallen for eight straight weeks. The economy grew 7.8% in the June quarter. In a post on flow problem, not a growth problem. For anyone trading USD/INR, that distinction decides where the pressure lands. The rupee has been hovering around 96 per dollar, with the Reserve Bank of India selling dollars to keep the move orderly (Rediff MoneyWiz). Orderly spot is not the same thing as cheap carry. The cost of that stability shows up elsewhere.

This Deriv review separates an account-history deduction from proof that money reached a bank. In a complaint dated 15 August 2025, a user labelled India said a withdrawal appeared successful but had not arrived. The uploaded image shows a withdrawal figure of −15.09 in a history summary; it does not identify a currency or bank recipient. Rechecked on 5 October 2026, this remains a historical report with an unverified final outcome.