Abstract:Popular Thai YouTuber Natthamon Khongchak, accused of a S$77M forex scam, is on the run, leaving thousands of investors in turmoil.

Natthamon Khongchak, commonly known as Nutty the YouTuber, is a popular Thai YouTuber who is apparently on the run after being accused of organizing a large forex trading fraud. According to The Nation, she is suspected of defrauding hundreds of investors from a stunning 2 billion baht (S$77 million). This story has sent shockwaves across internet trading, raising significant questions about investment fraud.
Natthamon, who has over 800,000 subscribers on her YouTube channel, Nutty's Diary, portrays herself as a successful FX trader. She drew many investors by leveraging her celebrity and promised them substantial returns in unusually short periods. Her investment plans promised 25 percent returns on three-month contracts, 30 percent on six-month contracts, and 35 percent on twelve-month contracts, with monthly payments.

The lawyer representing the victims said that around 6,000 individuals fell victim to Natthamon's alleged fraud. According to the lawyer, Natthamon used her influencer role to persuade individuals to invest in her scams, generating a sense of trust and trustworthiness. Her claims of rapid and huge rewards enticed many to invest enormous amounts of money.
Trouble started to emerge in April when her investors complained about late payments. Despite the rising complaints, Natthamon insisted that her followers' money was secure. However, the situation worsened rapidly in May when she disclosed to Instagram that she had lost all her money due to a trading blunder. She vowed to reimburse her investment, but legal complications exacerbated her financial problems.
Natthamon announced in June that she was facing two lawsuits, which complicated her ability to repay her investors. She cautioned that if imprisoned, she would be unable to make any payments. This news heightened the worry and dissatisfaction of her investors, many of whom had already lost considerable sums of money.
Natthamon is said to have fled to Malaysia when the crisis escalated. Her abduction has resulted in a trail of troubled investors demanding restitution. One persistent victim has even offered a 1 million baht (S$38,391) reward for information leading to her arrest, illustrating the desperation and anger of those impacted by the fraud.
Thai authorities are under pressure to locate Natthamon and bring her to justice. As the hunt continues, the issue remains a hot subject, with many people avidly waiting for details on her location and the status of legal proceedings against her.


FOREX.com, a US-based brokerage firm with over two decades of trading expertise, has received complaints from users on deposits and withdrawals. Users claim deposit failures and a slow fund withdrawal process. Additionally, there are complaints of wide spreads and account liquidation. These allegations have contributed to negative user reviews of FOREX.com. This article investigates user allegations and shares a regulatory overview of the broker.

Did you have to pay extra fees to recover your deposited funds on capital.com, a Bahamas-based brokerage entity? Were you denied withdrawals in the name of an invalid account? Did the broker fail to respond to your withdrawal requests for weeks? Faced losses due to alleged slippage and stop-loss errors? This capital.com review investigates user allegations and shares how the broker's regulatory structure appears.

Sri Lanka's Parliament Committee on Public Finance (COPF) has reviewed a final audit that puts the financial impact of fraudulent transactions at National Development Bank (NDB) at Rs. 13,639,664,684, a figure that is about Rs. 400 million higher than the bank's initial disclosure. The committee, chaired by MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, summoned Central Bank of Sri Lanka officials to examine the irregularities and the audit report, according to Newswire.

A vital post contains three separate assertions, and only the first is about trade policy. One, that Trump will impose large tariffs on India over Russian crude purchases. Two, that the H-1B visa action taken on the day of the post is the first in a sequence. Three, that Indian equities and the rupee are exposed to both. There is no figure attached to "large," no indication of which Indian exports would be covered, and no timeline other than the 3 November election date the post itself cites. The H-1B reference is equally bare.