Abstract:On January 8, CoinShares published its weekly report on inflows and outflows for digital asset investment products for the last week. It was a good week as they recorded aggregate inflows valued at $151 million.

On January 8, CoinShares published its weekly report on inflows and outflows for digital asset investment products for the last week. It was a good week as they recorded aggregate inflows valued at $151 million.
The firm noted that aggregate inflows since the U.S. SEC filed a lawsuit against Grayscale last year is worth $2.3 billion. Last week, Bitcoin recorded the highest inflow value at $112.6 million, followed by Ethereum at $29.6 million. Ethereums inflows over the past nine weeks is worth $215 million, indicating change in sentiment.
Cardano, Avalanche, Litecoin recorded inflows worth $3.7 million, $2 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. Blockchain equites had inflows valued at $24 million. On the other hand, Solana and Short Bitcoin recorded outflows valued at $5.3 million and $900k respectively.
“If many truly believed that launch of the ETF in the US would a ”buy the rumour, sell the news“ event, we surely would expect to see inflows into short-bitcoin ETPs, instead, outflows over the last 9 weeks have amounted to US$7m,” reads the report.
In terms of region, exchanges in the United States recorded 55% of the inflows at $83.6 million, followed by Germany and Switzerland accounting for 21% ($32.5 million) and 17% ($24.9 million) respectively.


Errante, a Seychelles-based brokerage entity, is facing serious trading allegations from users globally. Users claim to have earned profits legitimately using their strategies. However, on the Errante login dashboard, many users reported an automatic deduction of earned profits. At the same time, withdrawal issues allegedly haunt many traders here. While investigating, we also found complaints concerning trade order manipulations by the broker. In this Errante review, we have examined these allegations and given an overview of its regulatory status.

A forex liquidity provider decision now shapes the broker's spreads, fills, slippage, hedging cost, regulatory exposure, and exit options long after the platform is chosen. This 2026 guide explains what a forex LP actually delivers versus what the marketing claim says, how tier-1 banks, prime of prime, and multi-LP aggregators differ in practice, and how execution models (DMA, ECN, STP) change the broker's daily operating reality. It also walks through due diligence on credit, technology, reporting, governance, and exit, and shows how a 2026 broker can combine a primary LP with secondary routing without losing control of the client experience. Use the decision matrix, integration timeline, and operational tests to compare an fx liquidity provider before contract signature, not after a market event.

Did LMAX Group deny you withdrawals citing frozen funds at the wallet service provider’s end? Have you been so exhausted by the endless withdrawal hassles that you have begun to stop investing in the platform? Has this UK-based liquidity provider even questioned your fund ownership status when you requested withdrawals? You are not alone! Many users have complained about these issues while sharing their LMAX Group reviews.

A TickTrader white label can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the TickTrader platform is, where a Soft-FX broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server licence, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks TickTrader cost beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a Soft-FX TickTrader provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.