Abstract:California-based crypto exchange CoinList (CLM), which allegedly processed 989 transactions on behalf of users ordinarily resident in Crimea, has agreed to pay $1,207,830 to settle its potential civil liability.

California-based crypto exchange CoinList (CLM), which allegedly processed 989 transactions on behalf of users ordinarily resident in Crimea, has agreed to pay $1,207,830 to settle its potential civil liability.
Facilitating such transactions apparently violated the Office of Foreign Assets Controls (OFAC) Russia/Ukraine sanctions, according to an enforcement release published by the U.S. Department of Treasury on December 13.
The crypto exchanges screening procedures did not capture users who represented themselves as residents of a non-embargoed country but who nevertheless provided an address within Crimea. Specifically, the firm opened 89 accounts for customers who specified “Russia” as their country of residence but provided addresses in Crimea when their accounts were opened.
“Because ”Russia“ was provided in the country-of-residence field in these instances, CLMs screening protocols failed to recognize that ”Crimea“ or a city name in Crimea, provided in another data field, indicated likely residence in Crimea,” reads the enforcement release.
CoinList provided financial services to these users between April 19, 2020, and May 7, 2022, failing to exercise due caution or care for its sanction compliance obligations. The government department said the firm knew or had reason to know it was conducting transactions on behalf of persons who were likely to be ordinarily resident in Crimea.
Similarly, seven months ago, crypto exchange Poloniex agreed to a $7.6-million settlement associated with over 65,000 apparent violations of various sanctions, including those on Crimea.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
US Retail Sales Higher Than Expected; Weekly Jobless Claims Lower
Disclaimer: This material [on this website] is intended for illustrative purposes and general information only. It does not constitute financial advice nor does it take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Commissions, interest, platform fees, variation margin and other fees or charges may apply to financial products or services available from Eurotrader. The information [in this website] has been prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the information in light of your objectives, financial situation and needs before making any decision about whether to acquire or dispose of any financial product. Contracts for Difference (CFDs) are derivatives and can be risky. When trading CFDs you do not own or have any rights to the CFDs underlying assets.
Risk Warning: Trading leveraged products such as CFDs may not be suitable for all investors as they carry a high degree of risk to your capital. Please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved, taking into account your investment objectives and level of experience, before trading, and if necessary seek independent advice.


This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

ABET, a Bulgaria-based brokerage firm, faces severe allegations from users for the reportedly inefficient way it handles their funds. While some alleged illegitimate account blocks by the broker, others reported fund scams and trade manipulations. These ABET reviews have raised question marks over the broker’s legitimacy.

22K Trader, a United Kingdom-based brokerage entity, is facing severe fund scam allegations from Indian users, in particular. One user reported losing as high as $26,500 on the platform. Similarly, other users have claimed different loss amounts while also criticizing the forced trade execution by the broker. In this 22K Trader review, we have examined several user allegations and provided the regulatory framework the broker operates under.