The Insolvent Cryptocurrency Lending Company Celsius May Use Bitcoin And Ethereum Holdings To Repay
Abstract：Celsius, a crypto lending company that declared bankruptcy in 2020, may be able to settle its financial obligations through the sale of its increasing BTC and ETH holdings; however, this has caused discontent among some customers.
CryptoPotato reports that the insolvent cryptocurrency lending company Celsius might be able to settle its cash-based obligations in the near future by selling its recently profitable Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) holdings exclusively. As a consequence, the bankruptcy may retain a greater quantity of assets, while its counterparties are repaid at a significantly more arduous period to reenter the cryptocurrency market. Creditors of Celsius have voiced apprehensions regarding the company's ability to “rug off all creditors” if BTC and ETH both reach $54,879 per coin. For each coin, these estimates were derived using a 50/50 liquidation basis.
The firm ceased user withdrawals in June of last year due to the collapse of cryptocurrency market prices, which prompted Celsius to declare bankruptcy. Subsequent analysis of the organization's balance sheet unveiled a debt of $1.2 billion. The court approved the company's insolvency restructuring plan last month. This plan entailed a transition for the company into a Bitcoin mining and staking entity, which would be owned by NewCo creditors. It also entails the distribution of BTC and ETH valued at $2 billion to its consumers.
The bankruptcy could retain all other assets while repaying all USD claims if BTC and ETH continue to appreciate, according to a July thread by Simon Dixon, CEO of BankToTheFuture and a significant Celsius investor. Customers expressed a range of emotions regarding this outcome during their Tuesday discussion. Others, who had waited 18 months without obtaining their owed cryptocurrency payouts, were amenable to any immediate resolution that could help.
Read more
Errante Review 2026: Users Claim a Poor Trading Experience. What Does Our Investigation Reveal?
Errante, a Seychelles-based brokerage entity, is facing serious trading allegations from users globally. Users claim to have earned profits legitimately using their strategies. However, on the Errante login dashboard, many users reported an automatic deduction of earned profits. At the same time, withdrawal issues allegedly haunt many traders here. While investigating, we also found complaints concerning trade order manipulations by the broker. In this Errante review, we have examined these allegations and given an overview of its regulatory status.
Forex Liquidity Provider in 2026: How to Choose One Your Brokerage Can Actually Operate
A forex liquidity provider decision now shapes the broker's spreads, fills, slippage, hedging cost, regulatory exposure, and exit options long after the platform is chosen. This 2026 guide explains what a forex LP actually delivers versus what the marketing claim says, how tier-1 banks, prime of prime, and multi-LP aggregators differ in practice, and how execution models (DMA, ECN, STP) change the broker's daily operating reality. It also walks through due diligence on credit, technology, reporting, governance, and exit, and shows how a 2026 broker can combine a primary LP with secondary routing without losing control of the client experience. Use the decision matrix, integration timeline, and operational tests to compare an fx liquidity provider before contract signature, not after a market event.
LMAX Group Review 2026: Users Report Disturbing Withdrawal Issues - Is the Broker Still Reliable?
Did LMAX Group deny you withdrawals citing frozen funds at the wallet service provider’s end? Have you been so exhausted by the endless withdrawal hassles that you have begun to stop investing in the platform? Has this UK-based liquidity provider even questioned your fund ownership status when you requested withdrawals? You are not alone! Many users have complained about these issues while sharing their LMAX Group reviews.
TickTrader White Label in 2026: Can You Add Liquidity Depth Without Adding Operational Blind Spots?
A TickTrader white label can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the TickTrader platform is, where a Soft-FX broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server licence, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks TickTrader cost beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a Soft-FX TickTrader provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.
WikiFX Broker
Latest News
Apple Faces Lawsuit Over Fake Crypto App Exposing $1.8 Million Theft
WikiFXTrump Memecoin Faces SEC Scrutiny After Nearly One Million Investors Suffer Heavy Losses
WikiFX"They Want to See Your Face": Inside ATFX Cambodia's Rise
WikiFXSpread Cheating: The Invisible Trading Cost That Could Be Working Against You
WikiFXLevels Review: No Regulation and Mounting Withdrawal Complaints – What Traders Need to Know
WikiFXLQH MARKETS Review: Multiple Traders Report Withdrawals Blocked and Accounts Terminated
WikiFXBorn2trade Adds Copy Trading to 1:5000 Leverage Platform
WikiFXPILOTFX Review: What Traders Should Know Before Depositing
WikiFXLMAX Group Review 2026: Users Report Disturbing Withdrawal Issues - Is the Broker Still Reliable?
WikiFXTrade24Seven Review: What Traders Should Know Before Depositing
WikiFXRate Calc
