Abstract:On November 6, both the Bank of England (BOE) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published discussion papers regarding the regulation of stablecoins. The BoE’s focus is on stablecoins denominated in sterling (GBP) because it considers these to be the most likely digital settlement assets to be used widely for payments.

On November 6, both the Bank of England (BOE) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published discussion papers regarding the regulation of stablecoins. The BoEs focus is on stablecoins denominated in sterling (GBP) because it considers these to be the most likely digital settlement assets to be used widely for payments.
The apex banks regulatory regime is meant for business models that focus on payment-related activities and innovation within payments. Retail use and proposed limits are other aspects touched by the regime, based on the consideration that unbacked crypto assets, or any other unbacked digital settlement assets, would not be suitable for widespread use in retail payments in the country.
“It follows the principle of ‘same risk, same regulatory outcome’. To the extent that systemic payment systems using stablecoins pose similar risks as other systemic payment systems, they should be subject to equivalent regulatory standards,” reads the discussion paper.
The focus of the FCAs regime is on addressing the risks of stablecoins claiming to maintain a stable value relative to a fiat currency by holding assets denominated in that currency. The regulation is for prudential and conduct purposes.
According to the FCA, the Treasury is working towards defining fiat-backed stablecoins in legislation, such it captures stablecoins seeking to maintain a stable value by reference to a fiat currency, and hold (in part or wholly) currency as ‘backing’.
Likewise, they want to modify payments legislation to facilitate retail payments for goods and services using fiat-backed stablecoins. “This includes an option the Treasury are exploring to allow certain stablecoins which are issued outside of the UK (overseas stablecoins) to be used for payments,” reads the paper.


We all love trading geniuses and their strategies that earn them profits season after season. And we also love following them to make our investment journey seamless. Copy trading is one such tactic that beginners employ to enter the forex market. What do most of them usually do? They pick an experienced investor from the list and let the platform replicate every trade automatically. The fact that experienced traders continually earn profits, the feeling of copying their trades remains intense. However, the uncertain forex landscape can bite you hard by simply copying trades and not focusing on technical analysis and the charts during the day. Beginners can have a set of preconceived notions that can potentially open the gate for losses. In this article, we have highlighted such mistakes traders should avoid.

amari Capital, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage firm, may have limited user feedback. However, users only highlight the cons that warrant immediate attention from the broker officials to prevent a further dip in its trust score, which already sits at a low of 1.80 out of 10, according to the WikiFX data. Users have openly claimed foul play while trading on the platform. This amari Capital review aims to uncover those allegations against the broker.

Forex traders often wonder why the same currency pair, for instance, EUR/USD, shows 1.17450 on one broker but 1.17455 on another. This difference creates suspicion among traders, often leading to wrong calls and losses. Calm your nerves first by understanding that small price variations are normal and are a reflection of the global forex market’s operation. The forex market is decentralized with no single exchange or official price for any currency pair. That is some revelation for new forex traders. So, what’s the methodology for price determination? It is derived from an expanded network of financial institutions, banks, liquidity providers and brokers globally. So, as a forex trader, you must understand the price structure thoroughly to stay out of unnecessary chaos and continue to reap rewards.

Whether it’s South Asia, Western Asia, Europe or America, users all over are basically asking this: Why is VITTAVERSE cancelling my profits without providing any evidence? While they may be user allegations, a large volume of such complaints creates suspicion, if not affirmation, about the broker’s alleged involvement in profit cancellations. Users also complained about massive withdrawal delays in the name of ‘Account Review’ or ‘Account Upgrade’. This VITTAVERSE review article closely examines user allegations, including those concerning profit deletions, by the Seychelles-based brokerage firm. To give you a fair idea of its legitimacy, we have also provided a regulatory overview of the broker.