Abstract:The present article presents a detailed analysis carried out by Elliptic, a blockchain analytics firm, to disprove the assertion that Hamas financed its attacks on Israel using cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it explores the methodologies employed by law enforcement and researchers to track and immobilize cryptocurrencies. In addition to this, the article also sheds light on the prospective humanitarian uses of cryptocurrencies within the region.

The present article presents a detailed analysis carried out by Elliptic, a blockchain analytics firm, to disprove the assertion that Hamas financed its attacks on Israel using cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it explores the methodologies employed by law enforcement and researchers to track and immobilize cryptocurrencies. In addition to this, the article also sheds light on the prospective humanitarian uses of cryptocurrencies within the region.
Elliptic, according to Blockworks, has responded to a Wall Street Journal article from earlier this month that claimed Hamas funded its attacks on Israel with cryptocurrencies. When Democratic legislators inquired about the use of cryptocurrencies by terrorist organisations, they cited the report. According to prior reports by Blockworks, expert interviews suggested that the utilisation of cryptocurrencies as funding instruments was improbable owing to the characteristics of public blockchains. In a prior report, Elliptic asserted that law enforcement has the capability to “effectively halt the usage of cryptocurrencies by terrorist organisations.” Elliptic stated that there is no evidence to support the Journal's claim that Hamas raised “millions” in cryptocurrency and that data provided by Elliptic and others has been misconstrued.
Elliptic conducted further analysis on the funds and observed that, since October 7, a mere $21,000 in cryptocurrency has been donated, and most of this amount has been frozen by crypto businesses and researchers. As a result, Gaza Now has been unable to utilize these funds. In response to Senator Warren's letter, co-authored by numerous Democrats, Chainalysis advocated for a more thorough investigation into the potential misuse of cryptocurrency by terrorist organizations. According to Chainalysis, it is highly likely that only a small fraction of the $82 million in cryptocurrency was earmarked for terrorist activities, while the majority of funds processed by the alleged service provider were unrelated to such purposes.
Humanitarian causes have utilised cryptocurrencies to raise funds, as evidenced by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) enabling crypto donations a few years ago and Crypto Aid Israel garnering over $185,000 in cryptocurrencies.


Failed to withdraw funds from the Plus500 platform? Does the Israel-based forex broker give many excuses to deny withdrawals, such as imposing the minimum withdrawal amount restriction? Does the broker’s app fail constantly during the trading hours? These allegations have reportedly taken vicious shape on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Plus500 review article, we have examined these allegations. Let’s begin!

Have you made profitable trades on the OANDA platform but failed to withdraw anything? Have you been subject to manipulations in stop-loss and other trade orders? Did the United States-based forex broker delay both your deposits and withdrawals? In between, did the customer support service fail to resolve your queries? You are not alone! Several traders have reported these incidents on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this OANDA review article, we have examined these allegations for you to glance at. Read on!

Check VITTAVERSE regulation, license SD200, leverage, and user complaints. Review the broker facts before you trade.

Overview: A comprehensive investigation into the alleged scam case involving forex broker SixFX (Six Global Markets Ltd) in Indonesia. Explore an exclusive interview with an Indonesian victim, WikiFX’s review, and the latest user complaint evidence from 2026.