Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


ehamarkets is the focus of many traders on broker review platforms for all the negative reasons. Among the many complaints against the Malaysia-based forex broker, the withdrawal issue and the utter helplessness of the trader in recovering their funds stood out. The broker is accused of denying traders their funds using numerous excuses. So, if you were planning to invest in this forex broker, do not miss reading this ehamarkets review article. Take a look!

Witnessed a complete halt on your Bull Market trading platform after a good run? Did you receive a poor response from the broker’s official upon the trading halt enquiry? Failed to receive withdrawals despite undergoing numerous checks by the forex broker? Is your Bull Market withdrawal application pending for months? Did you have to encounter massive trading fees on the Bull Market platform? These issues have become rampant here, and we have highlighted them in this Bull Market review article.

Earned profits on the BitForex platform, but could not withdraw because of tax payment and other liabilities? Does the forex broker even flag your account with fake money laundering charges? Do you consistently face login issues when using the BitForex trading platform? Is your deposited capital directed to the wrong address by the forex broker? All these have become very typical of the way the broker goes about the business. Many traders have opposed the broker on several review platforms online. It’s time to check their comments in this BitForex review article.

For traders asking the important question, "Is FXPN safe and worth trying?", our research gives a clear and warning answer. After looking closely at its legal status, how it operates, and what users say, FXPN shows a high-risk situation that needs extreme care. We have gathered a quick summary to give you an immediate answer before you read the detailed results. The proof shows major warning signs that potential investors cannot ignore.