Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


Did your deposited amount fail to reflect in the ForexDana forex trading account? Failed to receive an adequate response from the broker’s customer support officials? Do you think that it is a clone firm that cheats traders? Were you fascinated by the profit shown on the trading platform, but could not withdraw funds? Have you been lured into trading by a deposit bonus that does not work in real-time? In this ForexDana review article, we have investigated some complaints against the broker.

Have you witnessed a complete fund scam experience when trading with SOLIDARY PRIME? Did you have a PAMM account that disappeared suddenly on the broker’s trading platform? Is the SOLIDARY PRIME customer support team inept in handling your trading queries? Did the broker deceive you on binary options? These complaints are showing up on broker review platforms. In this SOLIDARY PRIME review article, we have investigated some of the complaints against the broker. Take a look!

Have you lost funds using weak signals from Market10, a South Africa-based forex broker? Has the forex broker deliberately deducted profits from your forex trading account balance? Does the broker constantly delay your fund withdrawals? Did Market10 officials continuously call you to start investing with it and remain silent on your withdrawal requests? You are not alone! Many traders have reported these trading experiences on broker review platforms. We have shared some of their experiences in this Market10 review article. Read on to know the same.

Fideuram Direct review is gaining attention among Forex traders evaluating new brokers. However, safety and regulation are the most critical factors when choosing a broker. In this review, we examine Fideuram Direct brokers, its regulatory status, trading offerings, and risks — especially in light of its extremely low WikiFX score of 1.43/10.