Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


Errante, a Seychelles-based brokerage entity, is facing serious trading allegations from users globally. Users claim to have earned profits legitimately using their strategies. However, on the Errante login dashboard, many users reported an automatic deduction of earned profits. At the same time, withdrawal issues allegedly haunt many traders here. While investigating, we also found complaints concerning trade order manipulations by the broker. In this Errante review, we have examined these allegations and given an overview of its regulatory status.

The Reserve Bank of India has appointed Monisha Chakraborty as Executive Director with effect from 3 August 2026; she will oversee the Foreign Exchange Department and the Financial Markets Regulation Department. Chakraborty is a career central banker with over three decades of experience in Supervision, Foreign Exchange, and Government and Bank Accounts, and previously served as Banking Ombudsman. This report explains the significance of the new RBI Executive Director appointment for forex regulation India, the scope of the Foreign Exchange Department and the Financial Markets Regulation Department, and what authorised persons, banks, and forex market participants should monitor as the new ED takes charge.

A forex liquidity provider decision now shapes the broker's spreads, fills, slippage, hedging cost, regulatory exposure, and exit options long after the platform is chosen. This 2026 guide explains what a forex LP actually delivers versus what the marketing claim says, how tier-1 banks, prime of prime, and multi-LP aggregators differ in practice, and how execution models (DMA, ECN, STP) change the broker's daily operating reality. It also walks through due diligence on credit, technology, reporting, governance, and exit, and shows how a 2026 broker can combine a primary LP with secondary routing without losing control of the client experience. Use the decision matrix, integration timeline, and operational tests to compare an fx liquidity provider before contract signature, not after a market event.

Did LMAX Group deny you withdrawals citing frozen funds at the wallet service provider’s end? Have you been so exhausted by the endless withdrawal hassles that you have begun to stop investing in the platform? Has this UK-based liquidity provider even questioned your fund ownership status when you requested withdrawals? You are not alone! Many users have complained about these issues while sharing their LMAX Group reviews.