Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


Has your trading experience with Market10, a South Africa-based brokerage entity, been miserable? Did you fail to receive funds in your trading account despite approvals on the Market10 login dashboard? Did the broker constantly push you into depositing while withholding your earlier funds? In this Market10 review, we have shed light on the growing allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.

IC Markets Global review for South Asian traders. Learn how to separate the contracting entity, offshore licence, local forex rules, payment route, platform claims, and unverified online withdrawal discussions before opening or funding an account.

A white label forex can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the white label platform is, where a provider broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server license, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks white label forex costs beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a white label provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.

EmiraX Markets, a Comoros-based brokerage firm, is constantly receiving criticism from users worldwide, including those in Indonesia, Malaysia and Hong Kong. These users have reportedly accused the broker of holding their withdrawals without any reason. While some users claimed that profits were shown on the dashboard, while attempting to withdraw them, they were allegedly denied by the trading enterprise. In this EmiraX Markets review 2026, we have examined user allegations against the brokerage firm.