Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


INZO, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based brokerage entity, is facing numerous allegations from users worldwide. These allegations question the broker's credibility on withdrawal processing, bonus activation, and customer support. Allegations have circulated across several independent platforms such as WikiFX. This INZO review 2026 takes a close look at these complaints and reveals its regulatory status.

A public FBS complaint describes more than USD2,000 in trading profit followed by rejected withdrawal attempts. That is a user's allegation, not a verified loss figure or a finding against every company using the brand. For South Asian readers, especially those in India, the useful next step is to identify the account provider and the missing transaction evidence.

Is your fund with JustMarkets, a Seychelles-based brokerage firm, stuck for weeks due to an unexplained validation reason? Did the broker limit your order entries? Did you see losses on the JustMarkets login due to an abnormal negative slippage on your trade? Did you face an unaccounted fund deduction by the broker? Several users have reported these issues on independent broker verification platforms such as WikiFX. This JustMarkets review examines these reported allegations and provides an overview of its regulatory framework.

FIIs have been selling Indian equities for six years, and a viral post says the reason is simple: the rupee keeps falling, US yields pay 5%, so why would foreign money stay? Read on more updates.