Abstract:A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.

A press release was issued by the Council of the European Union on October 17, announcing the adoption of a directive that modifies the EU regulations pertaining to administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The directive primarily focuses on enhancing the reporting and automated exchange of information concerning income generated from transactions involving cryptocurrency assets, as well as advance tax rulings specific to high-net-worth individuals.
They want to enhance cooperation between national taxation authorities (DAC8), as well as strengthen the existing legislative framework. The authorities want to expand the scope for registration and reporting obligations and overall administrative cooperation of tax administrations.
“Additional categories of assets and income, such as crypto-assets, will now be covered. There will be a mandatory automatic exchange between tax authorities of information which will have to be provided by reporting crypto-asset service providers,” reads the press release.
They want to build on the definitions established in the MiCA regulations and cover a wide scope of cryptocurrency assets, including stablecoins, e-money tokens, as well as certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
DAC8 is interested in granting tax collectors jurisdiction for monitoring and evaluating crypto transactions carried out by individuals or entities within any other member state of the EU. DAC8 currently complies with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the regulations specified in MiCA.


Time is precious, more so in forex trading, where a millisecond delay can either make your winning position turn into a regretful loss or cut short your profit so much that it feels like a loss. While going through numerous user reviews, we often come across the disappointing experiences of slippage draining out their profits due to slow trade order execution. In this article, we have elaborated on low latency, its impact on your trading experience, a host of factors that determine it, etc.

As we examine plexytrade, we come across attractive terms like opening the account with just $50 and enjoying 100% tradable bonus and 120% cash bonus. These terms can prompt anyone to open a plexytrade trading account. But as an informed trader, you need to go beyond these marketing terms. What is the real-time trading experience? Are users receiving the benefits as promised? The plexytrade reviews shared by users online indicate that not everything is good at this broker. Traders have claimed pending withdrawals, high slippage eating into their margins and unwanted account suspensions by the broker. In this article, we have examined user allegations as well as provide our in-depth perspective into the broker’s regulatory status.

The moment the SQUARED FINANCIAL review column opens, a pattern of disturbing complaints appears, demonstrating massive user frustration over alleged withdrawal denials for months, fund disappearance from the platform, frequent login issues and more. These may be user allegations, but the lack of response from the broker side on many such reviews causes some doubt over this Seychelles-based brokerage firm. This article thus aims to provide an insight into the growing user resentment considering the nature of their complaints found until June 2026. Additionally, we will share the broker’s offerings and regulatory framework, allowing you to figure it out better.

Yes, it’s true! The Government of India decided to ban Telegram in the country on June 16, 2026, surprising many who rely on this platform for daily trading alerts & advisories. The ban has taken effect under Section 69A of the IT Act as part of the government’s plan to stop fraud during the NEET-UG re-examination. According to reports, fraudulent rackets were selling fake question papers for amounts ranging from INR 5,000 to 50,000. But the ban, which will be effective until June 22, 2026, affects far more than students. It transcended from a messaging blockout to a sudden disengagement from the app that shaped many traders’ daily routine over time. Out of the 15 crore plus unique registered investors in India, a large chunk sought trading tips, market news, along with buy and sell signals on Telegram. It must have taken investors by surprise. But is the ban detrimental to traders, or is there something more than meets the eye?