Abstract:On October 2, a Californian resident named Nir Lahav filed a lawsuit against Binance.US and Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao based on alleged violations of Security Exchange Commission (SEC) laws regarding unfair competition for their attempt at monopolizing the crypto market by bringing harm to FTX crypto exchange.

On October 2, a Californian resident named Nir Lahav filed a lawsuit against Binance.US and Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao based on alleged violations of Security Exchange Commission (SEC) laws regarding unfair competition for their attempt at monopolizing the crypto market by bringing harm to FTX crypto exchange.
The lawsuit filed in the District Court of Northern California noted Binance‘s investment in competitor FTX Entities and its crypto FTT four years ago. Specifically, Binance invested and owned up to 5 percent of aggregate FTT tokens in the market, and Zhao tweeted about Binance’s receipt of about $2.1bn equivalent in cash (BUSD and FTT).
The plaintiff claimed that the defendants were not happy with the efforts of Sam Bankman-Fried, the CEO and founder of competitor platform FTX, to promote regulatory efforts for crypto and crypto exchange in the United States, based on information and belief.
“On Sunday November 6, 2022, Zhao tweeted, ”Due to recent revelations that have came [sic] to light, we have decided to liquidate any remaining FTT on our books.“ On Saturday November 5, 2022, the day before his tweet, Binance had already sold and moved 23 million FTT (worth approximately $530 million),” reads the court document.
Another claim by the plaintiff says Zhao‘s tweet prompted a 14 percent fall in prices of FTT within 24 hours. One of the tweets by Zhao says “We are not against anyone…But we won’t support people who lobby against other industry players behind their backs.”
Zhao later revealed the signing of a non-binding to fully acquire FTX.com, but suddenly pulled back a day after, “now appearing to be armed with confidential information from FTX Entities”, said the plaintiff. He allegedly engaged in public dissemination of this information via social media platforms to hurt FTX Entities, thereby prompting a rushed and unprecedented collapse of FTX Entities.


This is the problem an Indian trader reportedly faced on the Oron Trade platform. The Saint Lucia-based forex broker, despite receiving positive reviews for a low minimum deposit and a 5% monthly withdrawable bonus, continued to be criticized by users for its withdrawal processing. In this Oron Limited review, we have thoroughly investigated user claims and revealed whether this brokerage firm is regulated.

TopFX, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, continues to face user allegations globally, including those in South Asia. While complaints against the firm are on several issues, the one that is very concerning is the alleged account termination following a withdrawal request by traders upon profit generation on the platform. Traders have even opposed deposit delay and operational glitches concerning leverage. In this TopFX review, we have examined wide-ranging allegations against the broker while also sharing its regulatory framework for an informed decision-making experience.

octa, a Cyprus-based brokerage company, continues to face a common question from traders: when will my withdrawal requests be successfully processed? Maybe not literally, but contextually, it is allegedly the issue many traders have reported on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Regardless of the trader’s region, be it South Asia, Indonesia, Brazil or any other, most traders have expressed their concerns over the alleged withdrawal delays or denials. In this octa review, we have examined several user allegations concerning withdrawal issues and other problems encountered on the platform.

Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.