Abstract:Asian indices are looking to open soft in Thursday’s session after major US Indices extended their sell-off in Wednesdays session on stronger than expected US data and a “hawkish” FOMC minutes where Fed officials saw ‘upside risks’ to inflation possibly leading to more rate hikes.

Asian indices are looking to open soft in Thursday‘s session after major US Indices extended their sell-off in Wednesdays session on stronger than expected US data and a “hawkish” FOMC minutes where Fed officials saw ’upside risks‘ to inflation possibly leading to more rate hikes. The Russell 2000 led losses (-1.28%) in the US on the continued underperformance of regional banks, though the risk sensitive Nasdaq (-1.15%) wasn’t far behind in a broad-based sell-off.

FX Markets
A jump in US treasury yields, which saw the US 10 year pushing higher above its 4% resistance level, and a risk off tone in the market saw the USD surge higher again, DXY testing and holding the big 103 level and pushing up to test cycle highs resistance at 103.55. Strong US data (Industrial Production smashing expectations) and the aforementioned FOMC minutes also being strong tailwinds for the USD.
JPY was markedly weaker on a perfect storm of rising US10 and JP10 yield differentials and a rampant USD. USDJPY hit a high of 146.38, well into the “intervention zone” where the BoJ entered the market to strengthen the Yen late last year. There is Japanese CPI data on Friday, but my feeling is nothing short of robust BoJ action will reverse this grind higher in USDJPY.

AUD and NZD were softer against the USD weighed down by the risk-off market tone and concerns about Chinas economic recovery. The Kiwi did outperformed the Aussie after Yesterdays RBNZ rate decision where they kept rates on hold but gave what was seen as hawkish forward guidance, this saw AUDNZD push down to test the big figure at 1.08 before finding some support. AUD traders have a pivotal employment report to look forward to today at 11:30 AEST

Gold continued its month-long downtrend, higher yields and a strong USD weighing heavily on the precious metal, with haven flows seeing to go anywhere but to Gold at the moment. XAUUSD pushing below its support level at 1903 USD an ounce and hitting lows not seen since March.
Todays calendar is fairly light with the major risk events being jobs data out of Australia and the US later in the session.



EMAR Markets, a South Africa-based forex broker, allegedly never misses the opportunity to disappoint its traders, according to their reviews. The user allegations present a disturbing picture, with users repeatedly complaining about pending EMAR MARKETS withdrawal processing in the pretext of a data review process that reportedly seems to have no end. They even accused the broker of withholding funds even after they paid the verification fee worth 2,000 to 5,000 yuan as requested. Some users complained about the not-so-meaningful updates and complete communication halt that further made the overall trading scenario precarious. In this EMAR MARKETS review, we have examined serious user allegations to provide an overview of the overall situation. To further help you assess its legitimacy, we have provided a regulatory framework of this company.

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.