Abstract:The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) warns the public about Solitix FX (Pty) Ltd and Mr Kevin Banks, urging caution in engaging with these entities for financial services-related activities due to their unlicensed status.

The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has issued a warning to the public concerning Solitix FX (Pty) Ltd (Solitix FX) and Mr Kevin Banks. Individuals are urged to approach financial services-related activities involving these entities with caution, as cautioned by the regulatory authority.
Recent information received by the FSCA indicates that Solitix FX and Mr Kevin Banks are engaged in providing forex trading services to members of the public. However, it is important to note that in South Africa, entities offering financial product trading services must hold a license from the FSCA.


Based on WikiFX's database, we found that Solitix FX is a low-rated broker that does not possess any license.
Therefore, the FSCA advises individuals to exercise vigilance and avoid conducting any financial business with Solitix FX and Mr Kevin Banks until their licensing status has been confirmed. Engaging with unlicensed entities poses substantial risks since there is no regulatory oversight to ensure compliance with the necessary standards and protections.
The FSCA emphasizes that licensed financial service providers are subject to stringent regulations and requirements to safeguard consumers. These regulations encompass robust risk management practices, client fund segregation, and disclosing crucial information to clients.
By conducting business with unlicensed entities, consumers are vulnerable to potential fraud, financial loss, and the inability to seek recourse in cases of malpractice or misconduct. Thus, the FSCA encourages individuals to verify the licensing status of any financial service provider before engaging in transactions or investments.
Playing a crucial role in overseeing South Africa's financial services industry, the FSCA ensures that companies and individuals comply with the necessary regulations and standards. The authority's primary objective is to protect consumers and foster fair and transparent financial markets.
To aid the public in verifying the licensing status of financial service providers, the FSCA provides a comprehensive database on its official website. This database enables individuals to verify whether a particular entity is licensed and authorized to offer financial services in the country.
Furthermore, the FSCA advises the public to exercise due diligence when selecting financial service providers. This includes conducting research and reviewing a company's background, reputation, and track record before entering into any financial agreements or transactions.
The FSCA remains actively monitoring the financial services sector to identify and address potential risks and non-compliance. In cases where unlicensed entities are discovered, the authority takes appropriate enforcement actions, which may involve penalties, fines, or legal proceedings.
Should any member of the public possess information or concerns regarding Solitix FX (Pty) Ltd or Mr Kevin Banks, the FSCA strongly urges them to promptly report it. Such reporting assists the authority in its endeavours to safeguard consumer interests and preserve the integrity of the financial services industry.

Established in 2018, FSCA is a regulatory watchdog in South Africa tasked with overseeing the financial services industry, enforcing regulations, and safeguarding consumer interests in order to maintain fair and transparent financial markets.
In conclusion, the FSCA advises individuals to exercise caution when participating in financial services-related activities and to be cautious of unlicensed entities that offer forex trading services. By verifying the licensing status of financial service providers and conducting thorough research, individuals can significantly mitigate the risks associated with fraudulent activities or misconduct.


Time is precious, more so in forex trading, where a millisecond delay can either make your winning position turn into a regretful loss or cut short your profit so much that it feels like a loss. While going through numerous user reviews, we often come across the disappointing experiences of slippage draining out their profits due to slow trade order execution. In this article, we have elaborated on low latency, its impact on your trading experience, a host of factors that determine it, etc.

As we examine plexytrade, we come across attractive terms like opening the account with just $50 and enjoying 100% tradable bonus and 120% cash bonus. These terms can prompt anyone to open a plexytrade trading account. But as an informed trader, you need to go beyond these marketing terms. What is the real-time trading experience? Are users receiving the benefits as promised? The plexytrade reviews shared by users online indicate that not everything is good at this broker. Traders have claimed pending withdrawals, high slippage eating into their margins and unwanted account suspensions by the broker. In this article, we have examined user allegations as well as provide our in-depth perspective into the broker’s regulatory status.

The moment the SQUARED FINANCIAL review column opens, a pattern of disturbing complaints appears, demonstrating massive user frustration over alleged withdrawal denials for months, fund disappearance from the platform, frequent login issues and more. These may be user allegations, but the lack of response from the broker side on many such reviews causes some doubt over this Seychelles-based brokerage firm. This article thus aims to provide an insight into the growing user resentment considering the nature of their complaints found until June 2026. Additionally, we will share the broker’s offerings and regulatory framework, allowing you to figure it out better.

Yes, it’s true! The Government of India decided to ban Telegram in the country on June 16, 2026, surprising many who rely on this platform for daily trading alerts & advisories. The ban has taken effect under Section 69A of the IT Act as part of the government’s plan to stop fraud during the NEET-UG re-examination. According to reports, fraudulent rackets were selling fake question papers for amounts ranging from INR 5,000 to 50,000. But the ban, which will be effective until June 22, 2026, affects far more than students. It transcended from a messaging blockout to a sudden disengagement from the app that shaped many traders’ daily routine over time. Out of the 15 crore plus unique registered investors in India, a large chunk sought trading tips, market news, along with buy and sell signals on Telegram. It must have taken investors by surprise. But is the ban detrimental to traders, or is there something more than meets the eye?