Abstract:The yuan weakened against the dollar after China cut a key lending benchmark rate on Tuesday, though rates were not reduced by as much as expected and the market was still awaiting more details on plans to stimulate a stuttering economic recovery.

The yuan weakened against the dollar after China cut a key lending benchmark rate on Tuesday, though rates were not reduced by as much as expected and the market was still awaiting more details on plans to stimulate a stuttering economic recovery.
China cut its lending benchmarks for the first time in 10 months, lowering the mortgage-linked 5-year rate by 10 basis points, though most market participants had expected a reduction of 15 bps, said Citi analysts.
The Citi analysts also noted that the lack of policy action to stabilize growth kept the offshore yuan weak despite “all the chatter in domestic media and from officials”.
Maybank analysts struck a similar note, saying the “yuan is weakened as a result of a lack of follow through in economic supports as promised by the government and rate cuts puts the yuan with more negative carry against the dollar”.
Prior to market's opening, the People's Bank of China set the midpoint rate CNY=PBOC at 7.1596 per U.S. dollar, 395 pips weaker than the previous fix 7.1201 and the weakest level in six months.
The spot yuan CNY=CFXS opened at 7.1680 per dollar and was changing hands at 7.1754 at midday, 134 pips weaker than the previous late session close.
The offshore yuan CNH=D3 was trading 49 pips weaker than the onshore spot at 7.1803 per dollar.
The one-year forward value for the offshore yuan CNH1YOR= traded at 6.9702 per dollar, indicating a roughly 3.01% appreciation within 12 months.
By midday, the global dollar index .DXY fell to 102.503 from the previous close of 102.522.


Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.

Switched from one trading strategy to another but could not avert heavy losses? Wondering what went wrong despite your market analysis being spot on? It may not be a strategic issue then. It may just be that you chose the wrong lot size. Yes, a single oversized position can get your account exposed to far greater risks than you may imagine. You may be moved by the impressive profits with increasing lot sizes. But by doing so, you also invite a proportionate rise in losses. This is where you need to apply the essential 1% risk management principle. This rule helps you assess how much you can afford to lose if a trade does not go as planned.

User complaints regarding profit withdrawals have become an increasingly discussed issue among some Exfor traders, including those in South Asia. Trading profits never come easy; they come by spending hours understanding the fundamental and technical factors and their impact on different markets such as forex. However, what matters is whether you are able to receive them. For exfor clients, according to their complaints, this problem is worse! While they claim profits on the dashboard, the same do not reach their trading accounts, resulting in many negative exfor reviews. In this article, we have examined user allegations concerning several issues, including this common profit withdrawal problem.

Backtesting remains one of the primary skills forex traders learn. By implementing a trading strategy based on historical currency pair price information, traders can view their past performance. The strategy leading to consistent profits during backtesting can raise confidence and lay a structured approach to the forex market. However, the path is not as simple as it may sound. Several traders tend to meet a harsh reality when transitioning to live trading. The strategy that seemed almost flawless on historical charts suddenly fails to deliver the results it did before. The sudden difference may not necessarily be because of a poor strategy. Rather, it indicates limitations concerning backtesting and several factors that play their part in a live market where conditions change frequently. It is thus important to understand these differences so that you can set realistic expectations and work on to achieve consistent success.